I think #7 is the pick for me - lower point of view and facial expression helps a lot here.
I like the expression in #4 and I think your timing was good in #5 through #8.
I can understand some of your frustration about seats; #1 and #3 have them in shadow so contrast is low, whereas #6 and #8 "pop" a lot more.
Quite a few don't look real sharp (apologies if that is my poor old eyes and laptop monitor) - is that a consequence of x2 TC? (I have never used a TC so have no experience)
My opinion does not necessarily make it true. What you do with my opinion is entirely up to you. www.acecootephotography.com
I think #7 is the pick for me - lower point of view and facial expression helps a lot here.
I like the expression in #4 and I think your timing was good in #5 through #8.
I can understand some of your frustration about seats; #1 and #3 have them in shadow so contrast is low, whereas #6 and #8 "pop" a lot more.
Quite a few don't look real sharp (apologies if that is my poor old eyes and laptop monitor) - is that a consequence of x2 TC? (I have never used a TC so have no experience)
Yup IQ takes a hit with a 2X, especially on cropped stuff
Comments
Its a series - some tight - some not so much (but all cropped a lot).
Shot with 70/200 + 2X TC. shiddy seats; good matches...
I like the expression in #4 and I think your timing was good in #5 through #8.
I can understand some of your frustration about seats; #1 and #3 have them in shadow so contrast is low, whereas #6 and #8 "pop" a lot more.
Quite a few don't look real sharp (apologies if that is my poor old eyes and laptop monitor) - is that a consequence of x2 TC? (I have never used a TC so have no experience)
www.acecootephotography.com
Yup IQ takes a hit with a 2X, especially on cropped stuff
Thanks for the look in & the comments