Portraits

Cajun PhotomanCajun Photoman Registered Users Posts: 9 Beginner grinner
edited April 19, 2012 in People
This is my first post and am asking for honest critiques. Thanks

Comments

  • jeffreaux2jeffreaux2 Registered Users Posts: 4,762 Major grins
    edited April 17, 2012
    Hi!

    We are neighbors! I have a girl in college at Nicholls.

    Your photos are not showing up.
  • Cajun PhotomanCajun Photoman Registered Users Posts: 9 Beginner grinner
    edited April 17, 2012
    Hi Jeff:
    I am new to this site and it'll take me a little while to figure it out . . . I am trying to post pictures
    I have seen your post of your daughter, very nice.
  • Cajun PhotomanCajun Photoman Registered Users Posts: 9 Beginner grinner
    edited April 17, 2012
    Trying again: This is my first post, would like to have some honest critiques - Thanks !
  • RyanSRyanS Registered Users Posts: 507 Major grins
    edited April 17, 2012
    Honest critique: This looks like a crop from a larger image where the main subject was standing next to someone else who has been cut out. While the smile and eyes are engaging, the composition, lighting, and color reproduction are not very flattering. The arm & hair from the missing second subject is quite distracting.
    Please feel free to post any reworks you do of my images. Crop, skew, munge, edit, share.
    Website | Galleries | Utah PJs
  • reyvee61reyvee61 Registered Users Posts: 1,877 Major grins
    edited April 17, 2012
    She's a lovely young lady but I echo much of what Ryan said plus the focus is a tad soft on her eyes.
    Yo soy Reynaldo
  • Cajun PhotomanCajun Photoman Registered Users Posts: 9 Beginner grinner
    edited April 17, 2012
    RyanS wrote: »
    Honest critique: This looks like a crop from a larger image where the main subject was standing next to someone else who has been cut out. While the smile and eyes are engaging, the composition, lighting, and color reproduction are not very flattering. The arm & hair from the missing second subject is quite distracting.

    Ryan,
    You are 100% correct on the cropping, I didn't realize that the hair and arm where there, missed that one. I appreciate the honest critique, I've been shooting more since I retired and consider myself still in the beginning stage. Thanks
  • Cajun PhotomanCajun Photoman Registered Users Posts: 9 Beginner grinner
    edited April 17, 2012
    reyvee61 wrote: »
    She's a lovely young lady but I echo much of what Ryan said plus the focus is a tad soft on her eyes.

    Thanks Rey, I think I know where I'm going wrong on the softness of the eyes, Appreciate it . . .
  • Cajun PhotomanCajun Photoman Registered Users Posts: 9 Beginner grinner
    edited April 17, 2012
    Ok - here's another one of my niece. Suggestions please?
  • reyvee61reyvee61 Registered Users Posts: 1,877 Major grins
    edited April 17, 2012
    Very nice, quite honestly I can't find much to critique here though perhaps if you had the space to do so in post I would shift the space on the right of the frame to the left to give more space in front of her. If not I would crop tighter to do so since I feel a bit bothered by the bit of her right hand showing through the glass by the door frame. Cropping tighter would allow you to give more space in front of her and you would lose the hand all together. Just my thoughts.
    Lovely portrait :D
    Yo soy Reynaldo
  • trooperstroopers Registered Users Posts: 317 Major grins
    edited April 17, 2012
    Re the second portrait, nice composition.

    But, for me, something doesn't feel right...the image comes off creepy to me...the posing/post processing/hair/makeup combined makes me feel very uncomfortable looking at for a few seconds...how old is she? Is she 10? 12? years old trying to look older, or vice versa?
  • Tim KamppinenTim Kamppinen Registered Users Posts: 816 Major grins
    edited April 18, 2012
    For the second image, the light is flattering, so good job with that. I'm guessing bounce flash off the ceiling? But it's bounced from far enough away, and the upwards head tilt also helps, that you avoided raccoon eyes. A tighter composition would have improved the shot; as it is, my eye is drawn to the bottom of the frame where the large white area of her dress contrasts with the black top. If that had been left out of the frame, all the focus would be on her face (where it should be).
  • Cajun PhotomanCajun Photoman Registered Users Posts: 9 Beginner grinner
    edited April 18, 2012
    Is this better guys? I've cropped tighter removing her lower hand and removed the white area to focus your eye more towards her face. She is 15 and was dressed for a prom night. Thanks for the suggestions .
  • trooperstroopers Registered Users Posts: 317 Major grins
    edited April 18, 2012
    Much better IMO. By cropping tighter, you have also removed the slight distraction behind her at shoulder's level. Two quick suggestions...crop a tad tighter to remove the sliver of outdoor light on the left side and turn down the hightlights.
  • YaflyyadieYaflyyadie Registered Users Posts: 558 Major grins
    edited April 18, 2012
    Many knowledge ones have spoken.
    You have had improvements from the first to the last picture and that is what's all about with this forum, learning to improve up to the point where you find mistakes and no, no's without someone pointing them to you.
    By the way, I'm one of those that have learned a lot because of CC's made here. (Some hurt your ego and probably are the best ones).
    Said that, I'll personally crop the door @ the left until just the frame is showing (no glass), I believe it distracts a little bit yet.
    JMHO.

    Great job and improvements, it shows you interest in getting better.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Y.
  • VayCayMomVayCayMom Registered Users Posts: 1,870 Major grins
    edited April 18, 2012
    WELCOME!! You have come to a place where you just can't help improving your skills. Nice shots, the only nit I have with 2 is that I have been told a lady's hand looks more attractive if the fingers are slightly bent. If you stand back and squint your eyes you will notice that the large unbroken area of light ( her hand) competes with the other area of light, her face. In PP maybe you could just tone it down a tad, it is about the lightest spot on the entire image. A little bit of a vignette might help this as well.
    Trudy
    www.CottageInk.smugmug.com

    NIKON D700
  • IcebearIcebear Registered Users Posts: 4,015 Major grins
    edited April 18, 2012
    For me the second image still needs some attention to cropping. First, it clearly needs to be straightened. If you feel, for whatever reason, that you want to leave the edge of the door right by the edge of the frame, it really needs to be vertical. Second, I have the impression you are trying to keep a 2:3 ratio for some reason. Perhaps for printing as 4x6 to send to relatives? That's fine, but I think the image would be stronger in a 4:5 ratio. I'd burn a lot of pixels on this girl. She's very pretty and photogenic.

    Oh: I second what Trudy said about toning down the hand in the foreground.
    John :
    Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
    D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
  • Cajun PhotomanCajun Photoman Registered Users Posts: 9 Beginner grinner
    edited April 18, 2012
    One more time, I really appreciate all the comments, I can see a BIG difference in the photo.

    Steve
  • IcebearIcebear Registered Users Posts: 4,015 Major grins
    edited April 18, 2012
    Oh, yeah . . . thumb.gif
    John :
    Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
    D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
  • adbsgicomadbsgicom Registered Users Posts: 3,615 Major grins
    edited April 18, 2012
    Very nice!
    In general, you will also get better image quality on this forum if you can link the image from smugmug, flickr or other website. There are some directions in the FAQ.
    - Andrew

    Who is wise? He who learns from everyone.
    My SmugMug Site
  • YaflyyadieYaflyyadie Registered Users Posts: 558 Major grins
    edited April 18, 2012
    icebear wrote: »
    oh, yeah . . . thumb.gif

    ^ x 2

    y.
  • trooperstroopers Registered Users Posts: 317 Major grins
    edited April 18, 2012
  • jeffreaux2jeffreaux2 Registered Users Posts: 4,762 Major grins
    edited April 18, 2012
    Hi Jeff:
    I am new to this site and it'll take me a little while to figure it out . . . I am trying to post pictures
    I have seen your post of your daughter, very nice.

    Looks like youve figured posting out!

    My daughter is on Fakier Jewelry billboards all over Houma to New Orleans. Keep an eye out!

    We should shoot sometime. Ever get to Baton Rouge?
  • HackboneHackbone Registered Users Posts: 4,027 Major grins
    edited April 19, 2012
    On the first one the catchlights tell the story. They are too low in the eyes and have given her dark racoon eyes as it's called. Also exposure seems off.

    On #2 try not to show the back side of the hand as that is its widest point and just makes it look fatter. The impact would have been improved tremendously if her head would have been tipped toward the door, at least for me. Again exposure seems just a tad hot but not too bad.

    When a subject wears dark clothing you generally should have a darker bkg and conversely if lighter clothing then a lighter bkg.

    For just starting you've got a decent grasp of some of the basic elements of photography. Just keep refining them.
Sign In or Register to comment.