Nikon Telephoto 300mm f/2.8n ED(IF) AF Autofocus Lens VS Vr Version?
Coleman Photography
Registered Users Posts: 351 Major grins
Wanted to get some opinions on the Nikon Telephoto 300mm f/2.8n ED(IF) AF Autofocus Lens VS. the VR version of the lens. I have found this lens very cheap in great condition and cant decide if I should jump on it or wait till I find a vr at a somewhat decent price.
How is the quality of it vs the vr version?
How does it handle a 2x converter?
ect.
Im going to be using it for surf photography.
How is the quality of it vs the vr version?
How does it handle a 2x converter?
ect.
Im going to be using it for surf photography.
0
Comments
As for using a 2.0x extender on it, you're pushing your luck. The 1.4x, certainly. The 1.7x is pretty good from what I've seen and heard. The 2.0x is a crapshoot. If you are shooting surfing as a hobby, get the 300 and the 1.7x and call it a day. If you are getting paid for this, buy the 500 or 600. You'll be much happier.
perroneford@ptfphoto.com
“PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE ‘JAZZ’ FOR THE EYES…”
http://jwear.smugmug.com/
I think I may be leaning more towards the 500 f4.
Possibly.
I can't seem to find many deals on this lens. Does anyone know and ideas of decent places or forums.
I have already searched
Adorama
BH
And KEH
perroneford@ptfphoto.com