Britni: Hot Springs
A few "classic bikini" shots from the hot springs...
#1: NIK_0291.jpg
#2: NIK_0307.jpg
#3: NIK_0299.jpg
5D3 + 70-200/2.8 IS USM
Processed with ACR7.x/CS6
The rest in Go Figure....
This post was made with the assistance of Star*Explorer
#1: NIK_0291.jpg
#2: NIK_0307.jpg
#3: NIK_0299.jpg
5D3 + 70-200/2.8 IS USM
Processed with ACR7.x/CS6
The rest in Go Figure....
This post was made with the assistance of Star*Explorer
"May the f/stop be with you!"
0
Comments
Link to my Smugmug site
www.cameraone.biz
I agree with the above...two is my favorite also. In one...I'd get rid of some of the celulite...not to flattering.
JMHO...
Educate yourself like you'll live forever and live like you'll die tomorrow.
Ed
The crop in #2 is too far back for me. It doesn't show her off at all.
#1 has her perfect body but is kind oof less interesting due to the up the nose perspective.
#3 is just about perfecrt, no arguments from me at all.
Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen
Why? I know how tempting it is in this age of digital manipulation to make the female form look perfect. But, in its natural state, except of a very select few, it's not.
Why would we or should we want a woman to look like something she isn't?
As for these pics, I don't think it's necessary with the possible exception of smoothing out the cellulite on the side of her right thigh. I think she looks great otherwise.
Link to my Smugmug site