Britni, Mark III: Hawtt Springs (18+)

NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
edited April 26, 2012 in Go Figure
The NSFW part of the springs. Bikini just didn't feel right, I guess, and we both were glad we could deal without it...

#1: NIK_0316.jpg

1815106743_xz3PBfX-XL.jpg

#2: NIK_0313.jpg

1815106844_8GzsgFp-XL.jpg

#3: NIK_0320.jpg

1815106971_VkMf8pS-XL.jpg

#4: NIK_0322.jpg

1815107065_7cD9Rgx-XL.jpg

5D3 + 70-200/2.8, processed with ACR7.x/CS6

This post was made with the assistance of Star*Explorer
"May the f/stop be with you!"

Comments

  • eoren1eoren1 Registered Users Posts: 2,391 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2012
    Damn Nik...how many hours did you guys shoot for?
    Number one is great here. Love the pose, her look (again). The painted toes pointing down. Great light and, again, DOF choice.
    #2 feels a bit 'forced'/'awkward' - can't think of the right word for what I'm trying to say here
    #4 is interesting but I wonder if it would look a bit better with the same crop as #3. I like the tilt/angle but that foreground patch of dirt detracts from the beautiful rich background.
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2012
    eoren1 wrote: »
    Damn Nik...how many hours did you guys shoot for?
    Number one is great here. Love the pose, her look (again). The painted toes pointing down. Great light and, again, DOF choice.
    #2 feels a bit 'forced'/'awkward' - can't think of the right word for what I'm trying to say here
    #4 is interesting but I wonder if it would look a bit better with the same crop as #3. I like the tilt/angle but that foreground patch of dirt detracts from the beautiful rich background.

    Not that long, actually, just a tad more than 4 hours (for my habits, it's a short shoot:-)

    Funny that you asked about #4 without the tilt....;-)

    1815197498_JnZv8zv-X2.jpg
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
Sign In or Register to comment.