5D3 Youth Hockey
jmphotocraft
Registered Users Posts: 2,987 Major grins
1
2
3
4
5
6
Very pleased with the IQ, AF, ISO, and general performance of the camera. C&C welcome.
2
3
4
5
6
Very pleased with the IQ, AF, ISO, and general performance of the camera. C&C welcome.
-Jack
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
0
Comments
Are you shooting from the stands or one of the benches?
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Thanks, Phil
"You don't take a photograph, you make it." ~Ansel Adams
Phil
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
My only suggestions would be watch the horizons on some and crop a bit tighter.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
I am very impressed with the quality of your work.
Would you be so kind as to share the essentials of the sharpening that you use?
I am aware of the date stamp on this thead, but still wanted to ask.
Many thanks
Great shots by the way. I moved up from a 1dIII - the ISO gain was nice, but what really has impressed me is how much more detail and color detail I have and can pull out when I screw a shot up. A much nicer safety net.
Thanks. These were processed from RAW in Canon Digital Photo Professional (DPP). I use the "Sharpening" setting rather than the "Unsharp Mask" setting and these were done at my usual sharpness setting of 5. That's it. Nothing fancy. This lens and body combo is very sharp.
I'm hesitant to advise you on this because I'm not totally confident of my choices, but I've been pleased with my results. So I would say YMMV and you should RTFM about this subject! However, the weekend after I got my 5D3 last March, I went out and shot skiers going off a jump and I just left it in case 1 and I was very pleased. I also seem to have had good luck with Case 4 for soccer and hockey, with the Accel/Decel tracking set to 2. Case 6 seems like the catch-all when you're not sure. I think there are some Canon whitepapers on this subject that we should probably both read.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Oh yeah... check out this little test I did: http://jmphotocraft.com/lrdr/seeingthelightroom.htm
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Thank you very much for the feedback! I am not a frequent visitor here as you can see...
I am still very impressed with the quality. I shoot a99 and get similar outcome only with SAL300f2.8 in well-lit rinks while shooting from the bench. My SAL70200f2.8 workhorse unfortunately is not that sharp at 200mm. I also shoot RAW and then process with LR4.3. I crank up Luma for high ISO noise reduction, but have very little luck with additional sharpening. Once again, many thanks for your reply!