My latest model find.

BilsenBilsen Registered Users Posts: 2,143 Major grins
edited June 15, 2012 in People
Here's my latest Mayhem model find, Charity. Arrived on time for an 8:30 AM call and ran through 4 looks in 3 hours. Oh yeah, she's also gorgeous.

Click the first image for her gallery:

p1001541258-4.jpg

2.
p508154037-4.jpg

3.
p1026660803-4.jpg

4.
p633332661-4.jpg

5.
p711681432-4.jpg

6.
p299967185-4.jpg

and, of course, the finishing headshot
p616362222-4.jpg
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->__________________
Bilsen (the artist formerly known as John Galt NY)
Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen

Comments

  • Bryce WilsonBryce Wilson Registered Users Posts: 1,586 Major grins
    edited June 12, 2012
    I love the lighting in number 4. It is PERFECT.

    I think weight on the back leg instead of the front one would look better for the pose though.

    Is there a "cute Girl" store somewhere in this area or what? I think I'm going to take another vacation in the Hudson Valley soon!
  • jmphotocraftjmphotocraft Registered Users Posts: 2,987 Major grins
    edited June 12, 2012
    Cute girl, nice pics. I think you should perform some surgery before showing her though, if you haven't already. She and many women have this issue where they have two different sizes and shapes from the waist up vs. waist down. Nothing wrong with that in real life, but for modeling it won't work. I would use the liquify filter to give her smaller ankles on 1, and smaller ankles and knee pits on 4, and do some skin smoothing on her legs on 4. And can you do anything about the underwire in 3? It grabs attention.
    -Jack

    An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
  • BilsenBilsen Registered Users Posts: 2,143 Major grins
    edited June 12, 2012
    Thanks Bryce.

    I agree about the back leg and we did go through that but sometimes she forgot and I was otherwise distracted.mwink.gif

    As far as coming here, just give me two weeks notice and bring every mem card you own.rolleyes1.gif
    Bilsen (the artist formerly known as John Galt NY)
    Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
    24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
    Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
    Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen
  • BilsenBilsen Registered Users Posts: 2,143 Major grins
    edited June 12, 2012
    All good suggestion JMP.

    I will say that except for blemishes, pimples etc, I usually prefer to show the model as she really is. I have been known to Liquify the odd muffin top but other than that I think she's better served showing naturally. Certainly, no CD is going to spend a lot of money on retouching if they don't have to.

    With that said, you are spot on about the skin smoothing.

    Thanks.
    Bilsen (the artist formerly known as John Galt NY)
    Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
    24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
    Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
    Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen
  • Bryce WilsonBryce Wilson Registered Users Posts: 1,586 Major grins
    edited June 12, 2012
    JohnGalt_ny wrote: »
    As far as coming here, just give me two weeks notice and bring every mem card you own.rolleyes1.gif

    Why, won't I have time to download? naughty.gif
  • BilsenBilsen Registered Users Posts: 2,143 Major grins
    edited June 12, 2012
    Probably, but you'll have to keep your tongue away from your card reader.rolleyes1.gif
    Bilsen (the artist formerly known as John Galt NY)
    Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
    24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
    Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
    Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen
  • BountyphotographerBountyphotographer Registered Users Posts: 413 Major grins
    edited June 12, 2012
    Nice shots what lens did you use, any flash?

    thanks

    Bounty
    :photo
  • BilsenBilsen Registered Users Posts: 2,143 Major grins
    edited June 12, 2012
    Thanks BOunty.

    Only flash is in #4' off camera left. All else,is just old sol. No flash, no reflectors.
    Bilsen (the artist formerly known as John Galt NY)
    Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
    24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
    Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
    Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen
  • GothamGotham Registered Users Posts: 187 Major grins
    edited June 13, 2012
    I like the edginess in #2 -- fits the model and the setting. Good work.
    NY's Top Family Photography Studio | Find Gotham Family Photos
  • BilsenBilsen Registered Users Posts: 2,143 Major grins
    edited June 13, 2012
    Thanks Gotham.
    Bilsen (the artist formerly known as John Galt NY)
    Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
    24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
    Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
    Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen
  • WachelWachel Registered Users Posts: 448 Major grins
    edited June 13, 2012
    JohnGalt_ny wrote: »
    Probably, but you'll have to keep your tongue away from your card reader.rolleyes1.gif

    Comment withdrawn.

    Carry on....
    Michael

    <Insert some profound quote here to try and seem like a deep thinker>

    Michael Wachel Photography

    Facebook
  • BilsenBilsen Registered Users Posts: 2,143 Major grins
    edited June 14, 2012
    What a great way to start the day.

    It has been some time since i've been greeted with sanctimonious, humorless condescension and, honestly, I was overdue.

    THANK YOU SO MUCH for your contribution. Feel free to disregard everything else I post at any time you wish.
    Bilsen (the artist formerly known as John Galt NY)
    Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
    24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
    Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
    Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen
  • jmphotocraftjmphotocraft Registered Users Posts: 2,987 Major grins
    edited June 14, 2012
    Wachel wrote: »
    What an utterly inappropriate comment. I hope no one like you ever photographs my daughter.

    Someone like you (and me) probably wouldn't be letting their daughter pose in a sexually provocative manner like this in the first place, so, problem avoided. But after 18, well, nature will take its course.
    -Jack

    An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
  • WachelWachel Registered Users Posts: 448 Major grins
    edited June 14, 2012
    JohnGalt_ny wrote: »
    What a great way to start the day.

    It has been some time since i've been greeted with sanctimonious, humorless condescension and, honestly, I was overdue.

    THANK YOU SO MUCH for your contribution. Feel free to disregard everything else I post at any time you wish.

    Comments withdrawn.

    Carry on.
    Michael

    <Insert some profound quote here to try and seem like a deep thinker>

    Michael Wachel Photography

    Facebook
  • HackboneHackbone Registered Users Posts: 4,027 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2012
    Come on folks.....sometimes some folks just like to be silly....no harm intended.
    Charles
    www.cameraone.biz
Sign In or Register to comment.