Thanks BD! It was a crap shoot with film so old, that's why I used the HC-110 but I didn't expect such graininess from an iso 125 film! It was an interesting experiment.
Awesome. #2 is an album cover. I think the arm and hand adds something nice. Everyone should shoot film once in a while for a change of pace. Forget Instagram.
-Jack
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Awesome. #2 is an album cover. I think the arm and hand adds something nice. Everyone should shoot film once in a while for a change of pace. Forget Instagram.
Thanks Jack - and I totally agree re: Instagram. I don't know what that is, but it sounds bad!
Thanks Jack - and I totally agree re: Instagram. I don't know what that is, but it sounds bad!
Basically it's film simulation software that people use on facebook to turn crappy point & shoot and cell phone photos into vintage-looking snapshots. For that purpose it's actually kind of nice because it takes otherwise unusable images and turns them into something nostalgic. But film is still better!
-Jack
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Comments
"He not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan
"The more ambiguous the photograph is, the better it is..." Leonard Freed
Lensmole
http://www.lensmolephotography.com/
Thanks lensmole. The grain is nice. Plus-X!
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Thanks Jack - and I totally agree re: Instagram. I don't know what that is, but it sounds bad!
Basically it's film simulation software that people use on facebook to turn crappy point & shoot and cell phone photos into vintage-looking snapshots. For that purpose it's actually kind of nice because it takes otherwise unusable images and turns them into something nostalgic. But film is still better!
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.