Options

Which Of These Treatments Is Best?

Bryce WilsonBryce Wilson Registered Users Posts: 1,586 Major grins
edited June 30, 2012 in People
Meant to be used as Senior Wallets...

Which one do ya like better...

Treatment 1
webjoshhockey2-L.jpg

Treatment 2
webjoshhockey3-L.jpg

Comments

  • Options
    HelvegrHelvegr Registered Users Posts: 246 Major grins
    edited June 27, 2012
    I think i'd almost like a combination of the two. The 2nd one does good for the gear, and the scratches on the pads, the stick etc. But I think it is a bit too much on face. I think the face on the first one looks a bit better. Great shot though, regardless of the treatment you go with!
    Camera: Nikon D4
    Lenses: Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR II | Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 | Nikon 50mm f/1.4
    Lighting: SB-910 | SU-800
  • Options
    christulkchristulk Registered Users Posts: 453 Major grins
    edited June 28, 2012
    Helvegr wrote: »
    I think i'd almost like a combination of the two. The 2nd one does good for the gear, and the scratches on the pads, the stick etc. But I think it is a bit too much on face. I think the face on the first one looks a bit better. Great shot though, regardless of the treatment you go with!


    Agree, the face on the second one is too harsh. The first looks really good.
    C&C always welcomed.

    Cheers

    Chris

    http://christulk.smugmug.com

    'alot' is two words "a_______lot":D
  • Options
    IcebearIcebear Registered Users Posts: 4,015 Major grins
    edited June 28, 2012
    15524779-Ti.gif
    But if I had to choose, #1 for a senior portrait.
    #2 for any kind of commercial application.
    John :
    Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
    D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
  • Options
    Bryce WilsonBryce Wilson Registered Users Posts: 1,586 Major grins
    edited June 28, 2012
    Thanks for your input peoples...

    Because of it, I decided to kinda split the difference.

    Thanks again!

    webjoshhockey3a-L.jpg
  • Options
    zoomerzoomer Registered Users Posts: 3,688 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2012
    Yeah somewhere in the middle. 1 is soft 2 is crunchy. Your last one looks about right.
  • Options
    YaflyyadieYaflyyadie Registered Users Posts: 558 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2012
    You pulled the best from the first two versions shown.
    Simply said, good got better.!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Carlos.
  • Options
    SamSam Registered Users Posts: 7,419 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2012
    Got here to late the final version is the one.

    Sam
  • Options
    HackboneHackbone Registered Users Posts: 4,027 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2012
    That is one cool shot. I hate living in the country for its lack of venus.
  • Options
    Bryce WilsonBryce Wilson Registered Users Posts: 1,586 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2012
    Hackbone wrote: »
    That is one cool shot. I hate living in the country for its lack of venus.

    I'll let ya in on a little secret.

    The venue and the player were taken at different times. :D

    If ya can't bring the venue to the country, the country boy can make a trip to the venues and keep using them!
  • Options
    HackboneHackbone Registered Users Posts: 4,027 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2012
    Agreed on that. If you've got some cool venues do some walkarounds with a tripod and bracket the exposures. Send me the files and I' I'll do some hdr with them and return the finished files to you.
  • Options
    anonymouscubananonymouscuban Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 4,586 Major grins
    edited June 30, 2012
    Bryce.

    Awesome photo and the last is the sh!t.

    I was going to ask if this was a composite. Not because you did a bad job or because I can tell. I was just wondering because I've been playing around with the same concept. I'm a big fan of Joel Grimes and he composites almost all of his shots.
    "I'm not yelling. I'm Cuban. That's how we talk."

    Moderator of the People and Go Figure forums

    My Smug Site
Sign In or Register to comment.