Anybody use a program in front of Lightroom for "ingestion"?
Helvegr
Registered Users Posts: 246 Major grins
I had been reading a bit about how some people use Photomechanic in front of Lightroom in their workflow because of its ability to better ingest memory cards, and for its speed at culling images.
Just curious of anybody uses such a process. I liked the idea of being able to hook up multiple cards, do a single renaming import, and copy those files to two backup drives, all right up front.
Lightroom can import from multiple cards, but I'm not a big fan of the way they implemented the ability to copy a file to a second drive.
I've got a bit of a trip coming up, so I was just pondering my travel workflow a bit, wishing I had a better way to get multiple cards onto multiple drives at the end of each day of shooting. Then bring those drives home with me, for the full import into Lightroom.
Just curious of anybody uses such a process. I liked the idea of being able to hook up multiple cards, do a single renaming import, and copy those files to two backup drives, all right up front.
Lightroom can import from multiple cards, but I'm not a big fan of the way they implemented the ability to copy a file to a second drive.
I've got a bit of a trip coming up, so I was just pondering my travel workflow a bit, wishing I had a better way to get multiple cards onto multiple drives at the end of each day of shooting. Then bring those drives home with me, for the full import into Lightroom.
Camera: Nikon D4
Lenses: Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR II | Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 | Nikon 50mm f/1.4
Lighting: SB-910 | SU-800
Lenses: Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR II | Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 | Nikon 50mm f/1.4
Lighting: SB-910 | SU-800
0
Comments
Author "Color Management for Photographers"
http://www.digitaldog.net/
As for others that use it, Zack Arias moved to that workflow about two years ago.
Thanks for the response. Lightroom still has the ability to ingest multiple cards at the same time, which is nice to give you a single import. What I don't think it does a good job of removing the initial step of backing up the files. I usually convert my files to DNG, then slap in some meta data. However Lightroom's 2nd copy only copies the original file, not the converted DNG.
I was actually just watching that video the other night. I hadn't really thought of adding software in front of lightroom before. My hesitation at this point is that PM is $150, and while it would do a great job,I'm just not a professional in demand of that type of software I think.
I'm considering trying out ImageIngester as lower cost alternative. Something that would just take all of my cards, rename them all to my naming pattern, add simple meta data, then copy those .NEF files to two separate external hard drives plugged into my laptop.
Then, i can do a single import from this drive into Lightroom on my main computer, convert to DNG and good to go. I'm curious about the culling of images in PM though, as Zack Arias does. I like the idea of a "cleaner" LR catalog. However on the flip side, I like having the organizational ability that LR provides for all of my images, whether they be selects or not.
Lenses: Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR II | Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 | Nikon 50mm f/1.4
Lighting: SB-910 | SU-800