Durango, Colorado from a visitors perspective

DougReddingDougRedding Registered Users Posts: 28 Big grins
edited July 25, 2012 in Landscapes
I recently had a business trip to Durango, Colorado and took along my Canon 7D and kit. All of these were taken with a Canon 10-22MM @ 10MM and about f/8, my first real outing with the 10-22....

C&C welcome

Thank you,
Doug

IMG5688-X2.jpg





IMG5667-X2.jpg





IMG5762-X2.jpg





IMG5358-X2.jpg
FAN Page: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Doug-Dont-Do-Weddings-Photography/100356406711320?ref=ts
Canon 7D - Canon lenses: 50mm 1.4, 28-300 4-5.6 L IS, 17-85 4-5.6 IS, 28-135 3.5-5.6 IS - Coming Soon: 70-200 L IS II, 17-55 2.8 IS

Comments

  • LightMagicLightMagic Registered Users Posts: 261 Major grins
    edited July 4, 2012
    Nice set!
  • DECinNCDECinNC Registered Users Posts: 63 Big grins
    edited July 4, 2012
    I like the last one.

    Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
    Dale Childress
  • black mambablack mamba Registered Users Posts: 8,323 Major grins
    edited July 4, 2012
    Very nice work, Doug. Each picture has a solid strong point.thumb.gif

    Tom
    I always wanted to lie naked on a bearskin rug in front of a fireplace. Cracker Barrel didn't take kindly to it.
  • DougReddingDougRedding Registered Users Posts: 28 Big grins
    edited July 4, 2012
    Thanks, everyone. I've heard a few C&C such as oversaturated and they seem a little underexposed. Let me know if you all see that? I used my MacBook Air to process these RAW images and wonder if I see things brighter then most...dunno, just a hunch.ne_nau.gif
    FAN Page: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Doug-Dont-Do-Weddings-Photography/100356406711320?ref=ts
    Canon 7D - Canon lenses: 50mm 1.4, 28-300 4-5.6 L IS, 17-85 4-5.6 IS, 28-135 3.5-5.6 IS - Coming Soon: 70-200 L IS II, 17-55 2.8 IS
  • hamsterhamster Registered Users Posts: 361 Major grins
    edited July 4, 2012
    They do look a tad underexposed (maybe not #4), and the saturation to me looks like you just used a polarizer.

    That said, I like the set very much, with 2 and 4 being my favorites.
    cherie1h.smugmug.com
  • kdogkdog Administrators Posts: 11,681 moderator
    edited July 5, 2012
    Really nice shots, Doug. These do present a bit dark. The trick would be to bring up the exposure a bit without blowing out those nice clouds. #4 is my favorite. thumb.gif
    Moderator of Landscapes forum
    Link to my Smugmug site
  • DougReddingDougRedding Registered Users Posts: 28 Big grins
    edited July 6, 2012
    Thanks everyone for the C&C - how interesting...more of you have said #4 and that is the general consensus among family/friends too...and also my least favorite. Huh.
    FAN Page: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Doug-Dont-Do-Weddings-Photography/100356406711320?ref=ts
    Canon 7D - Canon lenses: 50mm 1.4, 28-300 4-5.6 L IS, 17-85 4-5.6 IS, 28-135 3.5-5.6 IS - Coming Soon: 70-200 L IS II, 17-55 2.8 IS
  • joe-bobjoe-bob Registered Users Posts: 368 Major grins
    edited July 12, 2012
    They appear a bit dark, but otherwise fine shots. #3 is my favorite.
  • dragandjordjevicdragandjordjevic Registered Users Posts: 188 Major grins
    edited July 22, 2012
    They do look a bit underexposed. When using a polariser you must know that a polarizer's effect varies with angle, results can appear uneven when using a wide angle lens. Don't go wider than 28mm (35mm film) to avoid this issue.
    http://www.djordjevicphotography.com/
    follow me on: flickr - 500px - twitter
  • choudhrysaabchoudhrysaab Registered Users Posts: 249 Major grins
    edited July 25, 2012
    Rail Crossing picture is scary but it looks great.
    Abi
    http://choudhrysaab.smugmug.com
Sign In or Register to comment.