Another from Sarasota.

Yaflyyadie

One more from Sarasota this past 4 of July.
CC welcome.
Thanks,
Carlos

JC

fairly pleasant straightforward sunsets. Your exif is stripped, what was your aperture for these sunset shots?

When i have to shoot into the sun, I like to make the aperture as small as possible, even beyond the diffraction limit.

In your other shot, the path of the sun on the water makes the foreground important, I don't find the foreground here so compelling. Maybe try a crop just below the line of people and pool of water on the sand?

Yaflyyadie

kolibri wrote: »

fairly pleasant straightforward sunsets. Your exif is stripped, what was your aperture for these sunset shots?

When i have to shoot into the sun, I like to make the aperture as small as possible, even beyond the diffraction limit.

In your other shot, the path of the sun on the water makes the foreground important, I don't find the foreground here so compelling. Maybe try a crop just below the line of people and pool of water on the sand?

Thanks a lot for your opinion about the pictures, it is welcomed.
I have to check the original EXIF and will post with the rest of the info.
About the other shot, I will explain my intentions with such a long foreground with the sun fading toward the shore.

Once more, Thanks.
Carlos

JC

Yaflyyadie wrote: »

Thanks a lot for your opinion about the pictures, it is welcomed.
I have to check the original EXIF and will post with the rest of the info.
About the other shot, I will explain my intentions with such a long foreground with the sun fading toward the shore.

Once more, Thanks.
Carlos

I think you misunderstood. In your other shot, with the sun's reflection I do like all the foreground. In this shot however, I find the foreground not so compelling.

Yaflyyadie

kolibri wrote: »

I think you misunderstood. In your other shot, with the sun's reflection I do like all the foreground. In this shot however, I find the foreground not so compelling.

My apology, I really misunderstood, I should have posted both together and simply classified them as 1 and 2 .
No matter what, I explained the reasons for the second one, so it might be obvious now.
Check what you said and repost if I like what I see.
Thanks.
Carlos

JC

oh, and one more thing, your horizons are tilted slightly. More so in this image than the other. It's very very slight, but the brain picks it up as 'something off' even if the eye doesn't immediately see it. if you do any editing, you might want to correct that.

Yaflyyadie

kolibri wrote: »

oh, and one more thing, your horizons are tilted slightly. More so in this image than the other. It's very very slight, but the brain picks it up as 'something off' even if the eye doesn't immediately see it. if you do any editing, you might want to correct that.

It was done, let me recheck it.!!!!!!

O.K. This is the version with 0.13 degree tilt and cropped a bit so there is not too much foreground and other side picture distractions.
It looks like by cropping, somehow shadows got opened a bit, which I like.
Thanks.
Carlos

JC

Yaflyyadie wrote: »

It was done, let me recheck it.!!!!!!

Thanks.
Carlos

like I said, it's slight, quickly checking it took .6 degrees clockwise to correct.