Wedding photog Sued For $300G
Sam
Registered Users Posts: 7,419 Major grins
This is making it's way around the net. Something to consider.
Sam
http://www.petapixel.com/2012/07/24/wedding-photographer-threatened-with-300000-lawsuit/
Sam
http://www.petapixel.com/2012/07/24/wedding-photographer-threatened-with-300000-lawsuit/
0
Comments
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Ziggy,
While I do agree on the contract issue, there is noting in evidence that remotely suggests a contact would have avoided this particular situation. The letter from this alleged attorney has to be one of the worst written letters of all time.
If he stops taking drugs and can go into court and intelligently articulate valid reasons why the photographer ruined his wedding he might have a remote chance the judge will at least listen to him, but if he goes in with anything near what he wrote, I have a hard time believing a judge would even listen.
Plus the photographer has Gary Fong, an expert witness, (no matter what your opinion might be) to testify about the high quality of the photography.
My take on it would be to counter sue and make a formal complaint to the state bar association, not that I expect them to do anything.
Sam
If I were the defendant, I would lawyer up and ask for a bench trial (where the judge hears the evidence then makes a ruling). I'm guessing it wouldn't go so well for the "attorney". He might get his money back but I'm guessing even that would be wishful thinking on his part.
I feel sorry for the photographer; he made a huge mistake in not getting a signed contract for the gig (unfortunately, an extremely common mistake), and another mistake in not weeding out the outtake shots before sending the disk.
But I'm not terribly worried about this ridiculous threat of a lawsuit. It'll be laughed out of court, and when the photographer counter-sues for his fee plus expenses and damages, he'll win handily.