I Love My 105mm 2.8
![Bryce Wilson](https://us.v-cdn.net/6029383/uploads/customavatars/95/navatar_67395.jpg)
The more I use it, the more I love it.
I just got prints back from the lab today on this session. The difference in richness and detail that the printed product has completely blows away what I see on my (not cheap but not stupid expensive) monitor. I am seriously considering going back to print proofing rather than "video proofing".
The sprayed canvas mounts have an almost painting quality that is astounding. Hmmmmmm
![7951817966_024765ed3a_o.jpg](http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8302/7951817966_024765ed3a_o.jpg)
Teen Girl With Pretty Eyes by Bryce Wilson, on Flickr
I just got prints back from the lab today on this session. The difference in richness and detail that the printed product has completely blows away what I see on my (not cheap but not stupid expensive) monitor. I am seriously considering going back to print proofing rather than "video proofing".
The sprayed canvas mounts have an almost painting quality that is astounding. Hmmmmmm
![7951817966_024765ed3a_o.jpg](http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8302/7951817966_024765ed3a_o.jpg)
Teen Girl With Pretty Eyes by Bryce Wilson, on Flickr
0
Comments
Where her hair rests on the rock looks very odd for some reason...
Tell us a bit more about the lens, what brand is it ? I have used Carlzeis on my Nikon Camera and those are stunning but all manual focus (that is a bummer).
Regarding print proofing, do you print at home/studio, or send to an inexpensive shop first and then professional printer second?
Phil
"You don't take a photograph, you make it." ~Ansel Adams
Phil
www.CottageInk.smugmug.com
NIKON D700
oops, I meant to combine these but I thought I lost both of them, doh me, maybe I should reconsider giving people advice lol
www.CottageInk.smugmug.com
NIKON D700
Wow... Thanks a lot. I think that may be the nicest thing anyone has ever said about one of my photographs.
Good eye DS3, that never even occurred to me. I'll have to see what I can do about that while fiddling with her bunched up hair.
The lens, (my only non-Nikkor) is a Sigma 105 2.8 (whole bunch of other letters) I picked it up used and a very reasonable price. It is tack sharp, even wide open, but the AF is a little clunky. AF is fast enough, it just makes a whole bunch of noise. I originally purchased it as a macro lens for a DX body as it does 1:1 and has a manual mode, but I think it really shines as a portrait lens on the FX if you don't mind the "clunky" AF.
Phil:
To me having cheap proofs done defeats the purpose of doing print proofs in the first place. I don't want people to have to guess what the product they are paying for is going to look like. I want WYSISYG. I don't do any printing myself. I use a pro lab entirely.
Your gonna make me blush.
What? You don't think I look good in a tux? You're right, maybe I'll throw up a self shot nude and have Alex get on a plane to come kick my butt!
Las Cruces Photographer / Las Cruces Wedding Photographer
Other site