"Hot Tracks"
Hikin' Mike
Registered Users Posts: 5,467 Major grins
Taken Thursday morning at sunrise. Thanks to a friend of mine who told me about this location and more importantly, spotted for trains as I parked on the tracks to get the shot...
Canon 300D, 100-300 @ 100mm, Hand-held
ISO 400, 1/400 sec, f/6.3
Canon 300D, 100-300 @ 100mm, Hand-held
ISO 400, 1/400 sec, f/6.3
- Mike
Images in the Backcountry
My SmugMug Customizations | Adding CSS to Your Site | SEO for the Photographer | Locate Your Page/Widget Number | SmugMug Help Desk
Images in the Backcountry
My SmugMug Customizations | Adding CSS to Your Site | SEO for the Photographer | Locate Your Page/Widget Number | SmugMug Help Desk
0
Comments
Link to my Smugmug site
** Feel free to edit my photos if you see room for improvement.**
Use what talents you possess: the woods would be very silent if
no birds sang there except those that sang best.
~Henry Van Dyke
Mike, I like this a lot. The only way I can suggest improvement would be by changing the crop to ensure each rail strikes the side of the frame exactly the same distance up from the bottom of the picture. To my eye, the geometry of the framing needs to be absolutely precise for this kind of shot. But the lighting and overall effect is superb!
Dub, I actually cropped it already. Any more to the left would expose a tree that was annoying to me. Although I could probably clone it out.
Images in the Backcountry
My SmugMug Customizations | Adding CSS to Your Site | SEO for the Photographer | Locate Your Page/Widget Number | SmugMug Help Desk
Mike
I had presumed you had nothing on the left to add back to the picture, and that the solution might be to crop slightly more on the right, as per the example below. This would also pull the vanishing point across to nearly the exact centre of the picture.
If you felt the portrait shape was then too narrow, there would be an opportunity to crop a little off the bottom which isn't adding anything much to the photo at present and may even be detracting from it, as this appears to be a level crossing as there are no sleepers visible.
Does this explain what I had in mind with my original comment? Just my thoughts, but I hope this is helpful. The more I study your photo, the more I like it - it's a cracker!
As has been mentioned for me the bottom of the frame is merely distracting - I'd crop it.
www.finesart.com
If all the crossing is to be removed, we have a very different shot, but I think it still works.
Unless a bit more comes off the sides to give this -
What say you, Mike?
Had to play with it a bit:
..............................Mereimage
Images in the Backcountry
My SmugMug Customizations | Adding CSS to Your Site | SEO for the Photographer | Locate Your Page/Widget Number | SmugMug Help Desk
_______________________
Fridrik
http://www.pbase.com/fridrikth
Fridrik Thorsteinsson
I like it.