The Princess Lost Her Shoe
dkapp
Registered Users Posts: 985 Major grins
This is one of the first shots with my new lens (Tamron 17-35 f/2.8-4). The photo is entered in WA #126 "Junk" at Fred Miranda. I'm so happy with the new lens and the photo, I just had to share.
Comments and suggestions are always welcome.
Thanks for looking,
Dave
Comments and suggestions are always welcome.
Thanks for looking,
Dave
0
Comments
Thanks Damon. I had a lot of fun today. The weather was perfect, and food was even better. I almost missed this shot because we were running late. I'm glad I made one last stop on our way home.
Dave
http://www.lifekapptured.com (gallery)
It's actually the fence around an abandoned storage yard. The area is now occupied by gypsies and the homeless. Not the best area to be walking around, but full of photo opportunities.
Dave
http://www.lifekapptured.com (gallery)
Tim
Thanks Tim!
http://www.lifekapptured.com (gallery)
Thanks for posting.
Sam
So far the lens seems to be a great performer. This was shot at 20mm and a slight crop in post. Next time I'm out, I can take a brick wall shot @ 17mm if you like.
I'm not too familiar w/ the Rebel and kit lens, but I'm sure the Tamron line would be a nice upgrade for you. I have the Nikon D70 & kit lens. I consider this a major improvement from the Nikon 18-70 kit.
Let me know if there are other tests you would like me to perform.
Dave
http://www.lifekapptured.com (gallery)
I see the lines and curves too! I can't seem to get them out of my head right now.
Thanks
Dave
http://www.lifekapptured.com (gallery)
Just itching to say that I love my Canon Rebel kit lens. The one everyone loves to hate. I have had no problems with it.
Maybe I wouldn't notice. But I am using it for this challenge. Others can tell me, as I will be shooting at the wide end. I already have a photo up. (Many of my photos have been shot with that lens, wide.
ginger
I never noticed the barrel distortion in my pics using the Nikon Kit unless it was a setting similar to the one you posted. I know there is a way to fix it in PS, but I've never tried it. I remember running across something in my photoshop book a few weeks ago but can't remember how difficult it was. Maybe I'll have to give it a try one day & see what happens. With a wide lens, there will always be some distortion, but it does differ from lens to lens.
Now you've peaked my interest. Time for some testing old vs. new & see what I can do in PS to correct it. It will take some time to work it out. My work schedule is brutal this week, but I will try and post some good results when I'm finished.
Dave
http://www.lifekapptured.com (gallery)
I used the Free Transform tool in Photoshop to get these buildings straight - they had been leaning in opposite directions. Took a lot of fiddling, not something I've done much of. This was shot at 24mm with a Canon 24-70.
Before
After
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Your building seem to have a little wiggle in them - not leaning, but a slight bit off kilter. Maybe it's just me.:D Anybody else see this?
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
I'm sure you're right about the wiggle, I find this perspective thing to be very hard to do. I've read-up on it a bit... ultimately it seems to come down to skill and technique.
I haven't tried the perspective crop tool. I've read that some users prefer not to crop until they absolutely have to, so that they can preserve as much of the original image as possible. But my experience so far is that you always have to do some cropping.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au