untitled

bfjr

lizzard_nyc

When I first saw this on my phone I couldn't make out the magazine and as I tried to make the image larger I assumed it was a "man's magazine" or some kind of "car magazine", though the suit didnt' really fit to me. I cracked up when I saw what he was reading because it still doesn't make sense with the expression.

I"m so glad you didn't title this one.

michswiss

I really like the idea of this one, it's such a shame the feet were missed. I'm also thinking the blacks, or at least the shadows might be plugged as there are no details in much of the suit.

bfjr

lizzard_nyc wrote: »

When I first saw this on my phone I couldn't make out the magazine and as I tried to make the image larger I assumed it was a "man's magazine" or some kind of "car magazine", though the suit didnt' really fit to me. I cracked up when I saw what he was reading because it still doesn't make sense with the expression.

I"m so glad you didn't title this one.

Thank You and Your Welcome my pleasure.

michswiss wrote: »

I really like the idea of this one, it's such a shame the feet were missed. I'm also thinking the blacks, or at least the shadows might be plugged as there are no details in much of the suit.

Guilty Guilty twice!
Subject would not step into the light (shot in deep shade). Thought I had the feet, was walking towards him and snapping at same time did not want to loose his look.
No Excuses just the facts!

Patti

Some days you get what you get. Incredulity comes to mind looking at his expression.