'Common' is fine in my book ... if there were only half a doz breeding pairs of (insert any common species) in a partic area, snappers 'n twitchers would be arriving by the busload to snap / view
Imo, these'd all benefit from a much lower ... ie ground ... level pov. No idea what kit you're using, but if it doesn't have an articulating LCD, try / buy an angle finder, 'cos you can get lower than trying to peer thro' the vf and your neck won't ache as much as when using the 'belly flop' approach
The geese and ducks.... well let's just say I'd rather have a rubber suit to get down on the ground there.
+ swans in my case ...
I use a piece of insulated roll mat which can be washed/brushed @ end of session. Warm in winter, smoothes out bumps / stones / gravel etc + being light and easy to carry.
I'm trying to imagine the range of (additional) comments I'd get from wearing a rubber suit, btw
Well add in that this is a little pond in front of a local high school.... I'm not sure how well they would react to a fat guy rolling around in the grass and ...leavings... in a rubber suit with a camera with a 300mm lens
Well add in that this is a little pond in front of a local high school.... I'm not sure how well they would react to a fat guy rolling around in the grass and ...leavings... in a rubber suit with a camera with a 300mm lens
Well, considering the circumstances / environment related to this shot, I wonder if it'd be any worse ...
Me + mrs pp out for a walk one eve, saw (in poor light) what I thought were voles in a stream under a pedestrian bridge. Went back next day ... and they were rats.
Foot / bike path over bridge formed boundary between 2 local schools / playing fields.
This shot taken with me on wooden plinth in middle of stream (about 2in water) under the bridge, with kids of all ages going over the bridge, stopping because they'd seen my bike chained up nearby ... then seeing me in middle of stream ...
... I'll leave the rest to your imagination
(500 f4 + extn tube, btw)
Imo, if there's a possibility of a (half decent) shot ... just ignore the rest.
My real goal was to take my camera out and beat the devil out of the burst fire, and see how it handled shooting jpgs since raw gets me 3 very slow shots. I'm considering saving up my pennies for a 7d. 2.5x the fire rate though... good grief.
All in all, I'm pretty happy with the T3 in jpg when I need more speed. Might just be better glass time instead of a new body.
Comments
Imo, these'd all benefit from a much lower ... ie ground ... level pov. No idea what kit you're using, but if it doesn't have an articulating LCD, try / buy an angle finder, 'cos you can get lower than trying to peer thro' the vf and your neck won't ache as much as when using the 'belly flop' approach
pp
Flickr
The geese and ducks.... well let's just say I'd rather have a rubber suit to get down on the ground there.
Thanks!
+ swans in my case ...
I use a piece of insulated roll mat which can be washed/brushed @ end of session. Warm in winter, smoothes out bumps / stones / gravel etc + being light and easy to carry.
I'm trying to imagine the range of (additional) comments I'd get from wearing a rubber suit, btw
pp
Flickr
Well, considering the circumstances / environment related to this shot, I wonder if it'd be any worse ...
Me + mrs pp out for a walk one eve, saw (in poor light) what I thought were voles in a stream under a pedestrian bridge. Went back next day ... and they were rats.
Foot / bike path over bridge formed boundary between 2 local schools / playing fields.
This shot taken with me on wooden plinth in middle of stream (about 2in water) under the bridge, with kids of all ages going over the bridge, stopping because they'd seen my bike chained up nearby ... then seeing me in middle of stream ...
... I'll leave the rest to your imagination
(500 f4 + extn tube, btw)
Imo, if there's a possibility of a (half decent) shot ... just ignore the rest.
pp
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v492/pppix/_X1C9539Fc.jpg
Flickr
My real goal was to take my camera out and beat the devil out of the burst fire, and see how it handled shooting jpgs since raw gets me 3 very slow shots. I'm considering saving up my pennies for a 7d. 2.5x the fire rate though... good grief.
All in all, I'm pretty happy with the T3 in jpg when I need more speed. Might just be better glass time instead of a new body.
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.