New Nikon D200?
Lucky Hack
Registered Users Posts: 594 Major grins
Anybody got their mitts on one of these yet?
http://www.nikonusa.com/template.php?cat=1&grp=2&productNr=25235
I'm dying to get one; but I want to see the hands on reviews first.
I've read the Ken Rockwell review,
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d200.htm
unfortunately I was left wanting, guess I qualify as a "nerd" in his eyes...
hoping this message finds you well -Ian
http://www.nikonusa.com/template.php?cat=1&grp=2&productNr=25235
I'm dying to get one; but I want to see the hands on reviews first.
I've read the Ken Rockwell review,
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d200.htm
unfortunately I was left wanting, guess I qualify as a "nerd" in his eyes...
hoping this message finds you well -Ian
Chance favors the prepared mind. -Louis Pasteur
0
Comments
I guess I'm old-fashioned - I still like the Canon 5D's full-frame sensor - I can't get past the bigger-is-better phenomenon. But then, I used a 4 X 5 Zone V1 view camera for few years. And KR's concept of digital noise baffles me - I guess I'm more picky than he is. Canon still has a slight edge for me in this area.
But for me the D200 looks like a winner for these reasons:
- Controls - Oh, I love the Qual, ISO, WB buttons - and no more of the silly picture mode icon buttons (flower, runner, etc.) that I've never used.
- ISO 100 - duh Nikon, it's about time, now that Canon has raised the bar to a low ISO 50
- Body build and construction
- Price - very affordable for the package
- YRGB Histogram
Probably more bullets on my list but these are some major points.I knew, of course, that trees and plants had roots, stems, bark, branches and foliage that reached up toward the light. But I was coming to realize that the real magician was light itself.
Edward Steichen
Either way the performance of this camera is quite nice given the price point.
Thanks,
Lee
But surely, a sweet camera!
And oh by the way, the DK-17M 1.2x magnifier is alleged to work on pretty much any camera if you buy certain adapters and have *ahem* certain dremel skills, if you know what I mean. With that, and on the allegedly MUCH bigger and brighter D200 viewfinder (as compared to all lesser expensive DSLR's such as the D70) ...I'm hoping that the comparison between FF viewfinders and DX viewfinders will no longer be an issue for me.
And on the other hand, I'm just fine with the ISO performance of my D70. Especially with Adobe Bridge and it's RAW power. (pun intended) I've under-exposed 1600 ISO images to almost black, pushed them in RAW, and the clients were happy. To me that is what matters most. I'd switch to a "better ISO performance" sensor if I could afford it, but alas I am broke. And also I'd prefer that sensor to come in a body with the ergonomics and reliability I'm acustomed to, so go figure.
Cheers,
-Matt-
My SmugMug Portfolio • My Astro-Landscape Photo Blog • Dgrin Weddings Forum
The downside is that it's going to cost me a lot of money when I do get one. Not only do I have to buy the camera, I am also going to have to buy a new computer to handle those 10MP files!
There is lots to like about this camera, and as long as the image quality is good and the high ISO respectable, then I think Nikon will have a real winner on it's hands.:D
Thanks,
Lee
The D2X went down to ISO 100.
I'm on 2 lists for the D200. Saturday a Nikon rep is going to be at my local camera store with a D200 so I'll get to see one in person!
I knew, of course, that trees and plants had roots, stems, bark, branches and foliage that reached up toward the light. But I was coming to realize that the real magician was light itself.
Edward Steichen
We will be waiting here for your report as to your initial thoughts.
2 lists? Are you getting 2 or just trying to increase your chances of getting one in the first shipment?
Lee
As far as the ISO settings are concerned, what makes this camera very attractive to me isn't the ISO 100, but the pictures it takes at 800/1600+. From what I've seen from test shots, the high ISO performance is spectacular with this camera. The limitation I ram my head into on the D70 (:bash) most often is the inability to take high quality pictures in low light. The performance at ISO 200 has never been the problem.
http://cusac.smugmug.com
So anybody have any further news as to when we might be able to get our hands on one of these? I'm being oh-so tempted to jump off the Canon ship for this camera. Nikon ergos are something I've been wanting for a long time. Held a D2H the other day and LOVED it.
(no John, I don't need your D2H )
moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]
If I were a camera store, though, I might keep the demo model around to show to people to initiate NAS symptoms. So maybe you could still get your hands on one of them to look.
The more I read reviews of this camera from those who have used demo models, the more it looks like this one is a winner all around. Supposedly it competes with the 5D and the D2X, but its price is a fraction of theirs.
http://cusac.smugmug.com
And I of course take the ship date with a grain of salt. I remember a few years ago when my friend pre-ordered his D70 well in advance. Nikon was at least a month late on that one.
I guess we'll see.
moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]
My pre-order was submitted in early November but I imagine that the response will largely depend on the retailer you are dealing with and how much "pull" they have with Nikon.
Lee
But nominal ISO comes from sensor design. Without changing the design, having a ISO 100 setting would have come at the expense of dynamic range ... and more noise.
Thierry