Like to go back to the old style

SuzikaneSuzikane Registered Users Posts: 35 Big grins
edited August 1, 2013 in SmugMug Support
Good Morning,

I have tried out the new smugmug and I don't like I'm sorry to say....have chosen a couple of designs...but it's not the way I would like to see my gallery.

Is it possible to keep the old style..and to go back...?? How do I do that??

Cheers

Suzette

Comments

  • redcrown@mchsi.comredcrown@mchsi.com Registered Users Posts: 74 Big grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    Ditto, Ditto, Ditto...

    Sorry guys, not ready for prime time. I assumed from the demos I could try before I buy. I tried, I ain't buying yet. So how can I get rid of everything "new" and have my old format come up when I access the site logged in. So I don't have to click on "view legacy" every time?
  • davidmedinadavidmedina Registered Users Posts: 55 Big grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    I think we are out of luck. If I remember correctly there was a warning... On other words, I think we are screwed.
  • CanvasOfLightCanvasOfLight Registered Users Posts: 36 Big grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    Did you "unveil" your new design? (Not Publish, but Unveil).

    If not, then you still have your old design anyway. It doesn't go live until you click (and type) "Unveil".
    Travel & Culture Photographer / Photography instructor
    http://www.canvas-of-light.com
    http://canvas-of-light.smugmug.com/
  • SuzikaneSuzikane Registered Users Posts: 35 Big grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    Yes...I didn't click on unveil...so all my viewers still get the old style...but I would like to work in the old style too...

    so pls pls...someone!!

    Suzette
  • chaseltonchaselton Registered Users Posts: 130 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    Suzikane wrote: »
    Yes...I didn't click on unveil...so all my viewers still get the old style...but I would like to work in the old style too...

    so pls pls...someone!!

    Suzette

    Click on Legacy Style. That should take you back to the old interface

    --sent from mobile
    indefinite objects
    anything can be amazing
  • SuzikaneSuzikane Registered Users Posts: 35 Big grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    Thanks for your help..but where can I find that design...cause all of them are "new"??
  • chaseltonchaselton Registered Users Posts: 130 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    Suzikane wrote: »
    Thanks for your help..but where can I find that design...cause all of them are "new"??

    Are you trying to work in the old interface?
    If so, I don't believe customizing the new site design templates are available with the old interface...which is probably a good thing.

    What are you trying to customize on the new design templates from the old interface?
    indefinite objects
    anything can be amazing
  • SuzikaneSuzikane Registered Users Posts: 35 Big grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    Lol...I just want to go back to the old style.....and some one said to click on Legacy..but than you only go back to what the viewers of your gallery are seeing...I need to be able to work in the old style...

    I WANT TO GO BACK..the old style was way better in overview..much clearer!

    Cheers

    Suzette
  • richWrichW Registered Users Posts: 941 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    Suzikane wrote: »
    Good Morning,

    I have tried out the new smugmug and I don't like I'm sorry to say....have chosen a couple of designs...but it's not the way I would like to see my gallery.

    Is it possible to keep the old style..and to go back...?? How do I do that??

    Cheers

    Suzette

    Once you 'Unveil', the legacy site wil no longer be available. While in sandbox mode, your visitors will see the legacy version. In time, everyone will be converted to the New SmugMug. No word when, we'll keep everyone updated.
  • tullisfireballtullisfireball Registered Users Posts: 19 Big grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    richW wrote: »
    Once you 'Unveil', the legacy site wil no longer be available. While in sandbox mode, your visitors will see the legacy version. In time, everyone will be converted to the New SmugMug. No word when, we'll keep everyone updated.

    Suzikane is trying to tell you like a lot of other people that they DO NOT LIKE THE NEW AND DO NOT WANT IT! but it seems smugmug isn't listening. I think the new themes look cheap and I will be embarrassed to show my work with that look as it is now.
  • kyllitedrekyllitedre Registered Users Posts: 24 Big grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    Suzikane wrote: »
    Lol...I just want to go back to the old style.....and some one said to click on Legacy..but than you only go back to what the viewers of your gallery are seeing...I need to be able to work in the old style...

    I WANT TO GO BACK..the old style was way better in overview..much clearer!

    Cheers

    Suzette

    In this new preview mode You should see a button in the upper right corner that says something about using legacy style. I was also the one looking for it for at least 15 minutes :D
  • AndrewAndrew Registered Users Posts: 14 Big grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    I do like the new look, and am trying to fine-tune my folders and galleries. But I hate loathe and detest the "flat" configuration boxes. While the site looks good, and photos are showing up cleanly, configuration of the new interface is THE OPPOSITE of intuitive.
  • smurfysmurfy Registered Users Posts: 343 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    I'm in legacy view just to fullfill promises to clients right now...I just promised a Sunday wedding couple a preview, among other deadlines...
    Huge problem: Where are all the legacy view subcategories? i can't upload without creating a new one, and then can't navigate that new one from my old homepage, because it is not where it needs to be for client access.

    I thought nothing would change till we accepted the new view.
    This is making legacy view totally unusable for me, and forcing the change before I can even learn how to navigate. And right now I can't even center text in the new view, so that is also useless at the moment.

    If it's a bug, please restore all my subcategories ASAP. And if its not a bug, tell us. Cus those of us who categorize our client galleries can't truly 'use' legacy view when all of our into old subcategories have ben wiped away.
  • smurfysmurfy Registered Users Posts: 343 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    Just tried to move the gallery I created in the organizer into my old 'e sessions & weddings' sub category, and got an error message. It said it needs to work it's bugs out. Honestly, I just don't have time for this right now.
  • MichaelNovoMichaelNovo Registered Users Posts: 2 Beginner grinner
    edited July 31, 2013
    richW wrote: »
    Once you 'Unveil', the legacy site wil no longer be available. While in sandbox mode, your visitors will see the legacy version. In time, everyone will be converted to the New SmugMug. No word when, we'll keep everyone updated.

    I don't have time to sit and tinker with it right now. True that I unveiled, but the small details such as the right click message becoming a new default were not something I would have suspected before. So while partly my fault, there's gotta be something where we can code the site to go back to Legacy.

    For being a pro, this sure does make me unprofessional in front of my clients.
  • davidmedinadavidmedina Registered Users Posts: 55 Big grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    I spent 12 hours yesterday until the wee hours of the morning and I like it less every time I try to do anything.

    In my opinion, this was launch prematurely to rip benefits from the things that were going on over Flicker. There are no tutorials, no documentation, no guidance, as a result many of us inadvertly unveil the new site loosing any chance of going back.

    To me this has been a big screwed off by Smugmug.
  • zacHer0zacHer0 Registered Users Posts: 655 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    I spent 12 hours yesterday until the wee hours of the morning and I like it less every time I try to do anything.

    In my opinion, this was launch prematurely to rip benefits from the things that were going on over Flicker. There are no tutorials, no documentation, no guidance, as a result many of us inadvertly unveil the new site loosing any chance of going back.

    To me this has been a big screwed off by Smugmug.

    Lots of documentation, sorry you missed it.

    http://help.smugmug.com/customer/portal/articles/1229963-walkthrough-your-new-smugmug-site-in-5-minutes-or-less-

    http://help.smugmug.com/customer/portal/topics/538899-new-smugmug-transition/articles

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifuuczTQEwg

    I hope this helps!
    Zac Williams
    Support Hero
  • AtlpenAtlpen Registered Users Posts: 14 Big grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    I also wish that I could go back. I knew that I should have waited before moving over. Big mistake on my part.
  • colourboxcolourbox Registered Users Posts: 2,095 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2013
    I spent 12 hours yesterday until the wee hours of the morning and I like it less every time I try to do anything.

    In my opinion, this was launch prematurely to rip benefits from the things that were going on over Flicker. There are no tutorials, no documentation, no guidance, as a result many of us inadvertly unveil the new site loosing any chance of going back.

    To me this has been a big screwed off by Smugmug.

    I wrote a few unhappy posts in this forum before the switchover and I only mention that so that it's clear that I didn't start out as a cheerleader. I'm not saying that the problems you're having don't exist, but I think that saying that this is a rushed response to Flickr is to completely mischaracterize what happened.

    It was obvious to many people that the old Smugmug was way behind. Designing was clunky and limited, mobile support was atrocious at a time when it became practically required, and then they pulled an unbelievably huge rate increase on us without shipping a design upgrade they announced. That design upgrade was announced two years ago. I almost left Smugmug.

    Since then all kinds of photo websites modernized. Not just Flickr. The quality, range, ease, and flexibility coming from Wordpress, Squarespace, 500px, PhotoShelter, and many others zoomed right past Smugmug and set the bar at a level that showed just how much Smugmug was lagging. Many of the new Smugmug designs look like they were pulled right out of Squarespace, Wordpress, and 500px. That is what Smugmug was reacting to, an environment that existed long before this year. Flickr was one of the last sites to modernize; it was evident to anyone who watching the big picture in the industry that Smugmug could not be reacting to Flickr.

    (I won't even go into whether it makes any sense to compare Smugmug to Flickr. They're not Smugmug's real competition.)

    The fact is that Smugmug was not rushed. It was the opposite, they were late. Very late. At least two years late and after a long list of other sites had modernized. The timing was never a reaction to Flickr. It was because Smugmug was working on details. Yes there are things that are wrong and buggy with the new Smugmug. But if you have taken a close look at how the other sites out there work, Smugmug's execution of this is actually pretty good. It could have been much, much worse, because much worse does exist in some of those other modernized sites. Frankly I'm impressed with the new Smugmug. I just want them to get the rest of the post-launch fixes and features out (and I am sure they do too), but so far I am happy. But I will not "unveil" until I'm 100% happy with what my new site is doing.
  • SuzikaneSuzikane Registered Users Posts: 35 Big grins
    edited August 1, 2013
    Ok...can we go back to my topic....why isn't there an option to choose between the old and the new....if not..I'm thinking of going somewhere else...cause I think the new themes/layouts aren't really well arranged....easy view...I have several galleries with smugmug.com esp. this one

    www.foreversmile.smugmug.com is huge...and I don't want to go to the new themes..cause it's going to be a disaster..I think it's good for small websites/portfolios..but not for the ones..with millions of photos...

    here's a screenshot of my gallery....clear...and I want something like that...and I don't think there are a lot of themes...like the old smugmug had....it's more based on the layout of a website..and not a gallery...if you know what I mean...

    acvmRaN2.jpg

    and this is another gallery...of mine....

    adepX3mo.jpg

    Suzette
  • HamsterHueyHamsterHuey Registered Users Posts: 73 Big grins
    edited August 1, 2013
    richW wrote: »
    Once you 'Unveil', the legacy site wil no longer be available. While in sandbox mode, your visitors will see the legacy version. In time, everyone will be converted to the New SmugMug. No word when, we'll keep everyone updated.
    Hold on a second. Are you serious?? From all the hoopla over the announcement, it sounded like they would let us keep the legacy option if we wanted to. Now it seems that it is just a matter of time before a forced "upgrade"? If this is true, I guess I'll start backing up all my photographs on smugmug and start exploring alternate options. I could learn to live with the new Smugmug, but it just isn't worth the money I am spending on it when the upgrade takes away more than it provides me. And for all the touting of customization in the upgrade, It's all Mickey Mouse customizations with the heavy javascript customizations outlawed. rolleyes1.gif
    Unhappy SmugMug beta tester - http://smandal.smugmug.com
  • mbellotmbellot Registered Users Posts: 465 Major grins
    edited August 1, 2013
    colourbox wrote: »
    Flickr was one of the last sites to modernize; it was evident to anyone who watching the big picture in the industry that Smugmug could not be reacting to Flickr.

    (I won't even go into whether it makes any sense to compare Smugmug to Flickr. They're not Smugmug's real competition.)

    The fact is that Smugmug was not rushed. It was the opposite, they were late. Very late. At least two years late and after a long list of other sites had modernized. The timing was never a reaction to Flickr.


    I thoroughly and utterly disagree with your reasoning. The facts you list pretty much contradict what you claim.

    1. SM announced the new design over two years ago.
    2. Virtually every other photo hosting site has had a major overhaul, even Flickr (one of the last, in your own words).
    3. SM was very late, and obviously caught short by the change at Flickr.

    They couldn't continue with the "old" SM anymore, so despite it not being ready (after two years of promises) they launched anyway.

    From what I've seen it has been a mixed bag. The Flickr type uses really like it (new templates, drag and drop, no nasty CSS or scripting, YAY!) while the pros have found (the hard way) that many of the things they rely on are no longer supported, and only some of them are being considered for "future" enhancements. Work around solutions are being found for some, but who knows when they will get broken with a code revision.

    I have no intention of even trying the preview for several months, there are far too many reports of legacy sites being corrupted just by entering preview mode.

    SM absolutely needs to provide users the option to switch back to legacy mode (from preview or unveiled) while they work on finishing this obviously premature release.
  • HamsterHueyHamsterHuey Registered Users Posts: 73 Big grins
    edited August 1, 2013
    mbellot wrote: »
    I thoroughly and utterly disagree with your reasoning. The facts you list pretty much contradict what you claim.

    1. SM announced the new design over two years ago.
    2. Virtually every other photo hosting site has had a major overhaul, even Flickr (one of the last, in your own words).
    3. SM was very late, and obviously caught short by the change at Flickr.

    They couldn't continue with the "old" SM anymore, so despite it not being ready (after two years of promises) they launched anyway.

    From what I've seen it has been a mixed bag. The Flickr type uses really like it (new templates, drag and drop, no nasty CSS or scripting, YAY!) while the pros have found (the hard way) that many of the things they rely on are no longer supported, and only some of them are being considered for "future" enhancements. Work around solutions are being found for some, but who knows when they will get broken with a code revision.

    I have no intention of even trying the preview for several months, there are far too many reports of legacy sites being corrupted just by entering preview mode.

    SM absolutely needs to provide users the option to switch back to legacy mode (from preview or unveiled) while they work on finishing this obviously premature release.

    Wise decision not to preview. I wouldn't have either, if it hadn't been for all the trumpeting of it all being "Sandboxed". I have a fair bit of experience with Wordpress and I figured the sandboxing would be like previewing themes on Wordpress. Little did I know that Smugmugs definition of sandboxing goes against all common sense. Now I have renamed subcategory names and missing galleries in my legacy site, all from previewing an "upgrade" I have no interest in upgrading to.
    Unhappy SmugMug beta tester - http://smandal.smugmug.com
  • Cygnus StudiosCygnus Studios Registered Users Posts: 2,294 Major grins
    edited August 1, 2013
    Hold on a second. Are you serious?? From all the hoopla over the announcement, it sounded like they would let us keep the legacy option if we wanted to. Now it seems that it is just a matter of time before a forced "upgrade"?

    It is true. There are several threads from smugmug saying that everyone will be forced to "upgrade". As usual, the standard statement was given "There is no timeline for this".

    mbellot wrote: »
    From what I've seen it has been a mixed bag. The Flickr type uses really like it (new templates, drag and drop, no nasty CSS or scripting, YAY!) while the pros have found (the hard way) that many of the things they rely on are no longer supported, and only some of them are being considered for "future" enhancements. Work around solutions are being found for some, but who knows when they will get broken with a code revision.

    15524779-Ti.gif

    For those who simply want to share photos, I'm sure that this is a very cool thing. It very much looks like the newer upgrades seen elsewhere. Dozens of nice big images on the homepage, with a search and browse button. No wonder some were able to migrate in under an hour.

    For those of us who spent many days creating a functioning website, this is not the easiest of transitions. The great features were left out of this "upgrade" and many of the things we took for granted, like embedding calendars and contact pages are no longer possible (at least not yet).

    It feels like there aren't enough of us (website builders) left to make a dent in the process.

    This upgrade seems very much like an updated version of the easy customizer. Dumb down the system and more people can use it. That equals lots of users and more money. From a business standpoint I completely understand that.
    Steve

    Website
Sign In or Register to comment.