Some of us used up our votes a long time ago on the feedback site...I wish I had some votes to use! Smugmug claims that you'll get your votes back once they implement the feedback idea, but it seems that they've never implemented any of mine. I wish they'd given us a new wad of votes to spend when the new Smugmug rolled out.
But I definitely agree that the Quick Settings feature needs to be improved - allow delete - allow overwrite - expand them so you can actually see their full names.
Some of us used up our votes a long time ago on the feedback site...I wish I had some votes to use! Smugmug claims that you'll get your votes back once they implement the feedback idea, but it seems that they've never implemented any of mine. I wish they'd given us a new wad of votes to spend when the new Smugmug rolled out.
But I definitely agree that the Quick Settings feature needs to be improved - allow delete - allow overwrite - expand them so you can actually see their full names.
I voted, but don't see it there anywhere/anymore. I can see the concept of allowing votes & feedback as some form of measurement tool (as I saw argued in another forum). But I think it needs to be further refined because to me, it's confusing (limited votes, whether I should spend time posting feedback with my vote, posting in this forum or emailing for support) because I don't know which will net the best result (for myself & others). Basically, I see that almost every user is interested in helping improve SM in some way. What we need is a simple way to find & understand what's happening. Please try & find a way to simplify & streamline the process of reporting, identifying & following progress on problems & upgrades. It's very frustrating to spend hours online searching through forums & posts to find something that MIGHT be helpful, especially since you have taken away your chat service (and don't offer phone support).
I still believe all the posts listed here prove this is still a much needed repair.
I don't know why it matters if it is on the feedback site, does it get looked at by admins? Some items I've seen out there for 3+ years haven't had responses from them.
This is a major +5 and also the ability to read all the name is another +5.
I don't know why it matters if it is on the feedback site, does it get looked at by admins? Some items I've seen out there for 3+ years haven't had responses from them.
This is a major +5 and also the ability to read all the name is another +5.
I just voted too, this problem seems pretty obvious to me & imagine it's just a matter of time before they get to it. I know this probably belongs in another forum, but I also think that we should not be limited to 12 votes, otherwise we may not be able to vote for multiple items which we think are important.
+10000
How is this not possible! Ugh so frustrating as I have now two quick settings with the same (almost the same) name and the window doesn't say the full setting name so I don't know which is which and therefore need to create a third one!
PS - I can't seem to get my quick settings to save the part about boutique packaging correctly. Whenever I select a quick setting, it changes Boutique Packaging to NO, even if I KNOW I set it to yes in that quick setting. And of course, since I can't delete quick settings, now I have way too many different ones saved trying to fix this problem.
PS - I can't seem to get my quick settings to save the part about boutique packaging correctly
In another topic, a SmugMug dev mentioned that the Quick Settings don't support a bunch of the new options. You should post a new thread in the Bug Report or Feature Request forums with that specific request (boutique packaging support for quick settings) so they know that there's interest in getting that fixed.
This is broken functionality unfixed from Legacy Smugmug
Smug Programmers - You cannot leave this unaddressed !!!
While the Legacy implementation was very ugly and clunky it was at least working. I can understand you may want time to do a more 2.0 redesign but you cannot leave this legacy feature unimplemented / unfixed in Smug 2.0.
It would be better if you discontinued the feature altogether and then the community would vote and you could see how important this is rather than just leaving it unaddressed and hoping people will workaround it.
Could someone from SmugMug please update us on this.
I just email their help desk and sent them this forum post. This is the response I got:
"Thanks for contacting SmugMug. Yes, we are aware of the thread. I don't have any updates at the moment, but this is something I know many users have concerns about, and it is something that's on our radar to get fixed. I'll see if we can get any more info on this and get someone to reply publicly in the thread as well. Thanks for taking the time to bring this up again "
Please add option to delete quick settings
As a coder myself this should be about as easy a quick fix as there could ever be. Please add an option to delete old, outdated, messed up, unused gallery quick settings.
I ended up installing the lightroom plugin to delete the old quick settings. That's a pretty heavy-handed way to remove something that should be able to be deleted from the product UI, but it did work. I still believe the UI needs delete capability for quick settings.
Denise, at least you use Lightroom and can delete it that way. Us "little guys" who don't use that program (got Photoshop here) can't do what you can so this needs to be added to the UI. Any updates MB?
Comments
work in old version no problem, what's the hold up ?
CSS Block To Flow Down To Children Folders/Pages/Galleries
[URL="http://feedback.smugmug.com/forums/17723-smugmug/suggestions/1104583-a-bulk-
gallery-download-button-for-my-visitors"]bulk download option for clients[/URL]
Some of us used up our votes a long time ago on the feedback site...I wish I had some votes to use! Smugmug claims that you'll get your votes back once they implement the feedback idea, but it seems that they've never implemented any of mine. I wish they'd given us a new wad of votes to spend when the new Smugmug rolled out.
But I definitely agree that the Quick Settings feature needs to be improved - allow delete - allow overwrite - expand them so you can actually see their full names.
Same here!
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
Photo Blog
I still believe all the posts listed here prove this is still a much needed repair.
I don't know why it matters if it is on the feedback site, does it get looked at by admins? Some items I've seen out there for 3+ years haven't had responses from them.
This is a major +5 and also the ability to read all the name is another +5.
+5
Cheers,
+10000
How is this not possible! Ugh so frustrating as I have now two quick settings with the same (almost the same) name and the window doesn't say the full setting name so I don't know which is which and therefore need to create a third one!
__________________________________
http://www.MakeItABradford.com
PS - I can't seem to get my quick settings to save the part about boutique packaging correctly. Whenever I select a quick setting, it changes Boutique Packaging to NO, even if I KNOW I set it to yes in that quick setting. And of course, since I can't delete quick settings, now I have way too many different ones saved trying to fix this problem.
Jason Scott Photography | Blog | FB | Twitter | Google+ | Tumblr | Instagram | YouTube
In another topic, a SmugMug dev mentioned that the Quick Settings don't support a bunch of the new options. You should post a new thread in the Bug Report or Feature Request forums with that specific request (boutique packaging support for quick settings) so they know that there's interest in getting that fixed.
Please check out my gallery of customisations for the New SmugMug, more to come!
I also voted.
http://www.fernandogonzalez.net
Any updates Smugmug?
Mel Jones Photography Ltd.
School and Nursery Photographer working in Blackpool and Lancashire, UK.
Google+ Page / Local | Facebook Page
Smug Programmers - You cannot leave this unaddressed !!!
While the Legacy implementation was very ugly and clunky it was at least working. I can understand you may want time to do a more 2.0 redesign but you cannot leave this legacy feature unimplemented / unfixed in Smug 2.0.
It would be better if you discontinued the feature altogether and then the community would vote and you could see how important this is rather than just leaving it unaddressed and hoping people will workaround it.
Could someone from SmugMug please update us on this.
Thx
Andrew Mumford
"Thanks for contacting SmugMug. Yes, we are aware of the thread. I don't have any updates at the moment, but this is something I know many users have concerns about, and it is something that's on our radar to get fixed. I'll see if we can get any more info on this and get someone to reply publicly in the thread as well. Thanks for taking the time to bring this up again
We'll see.
http://www.fernandogonzalez.net
My fault for not seeing this before. I am getting an update on the status of this, and will hopefully have an update on the status next week.
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
Photo Blog
As a coder myself this should be about as easy a quick fix as there could ever be. Please add an option to delete old, outdated, messed up, unused gallery quick settings.
Thanks much
is there really not a way to delete old ones? or rename or overwrite? crazy!
yes we need this pronto!
Priorities are messed up on what is being worked on first.
This is a good example of ignored important fixes.
Cheers,
Mel Jones Photography Ltd.
School and Nursery Photographer working in Blackpool and Lancashire, UK.
Google+ Page / Local | Facebook Page
I don't use the plugin to upload and I have no desire to install it.
When will a delete button for quick settings be available in your UI?
--- Denise
Musings & ramblings at https://denisegoldberg.blogspot.com
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
Photo Blog
Thanks to devbobo for implementing the delete.
--- Denise
Musings & ramblings at https://denisegoldberg.blogspot.com
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
Photo Blog
Bump. Any update on this? So frustrating.
Thanks!