Shooting Shirtless Shots [PG]

PrezwoodzPrezwoodz Registered Users Posts: 1,147 Major grins
edited December 18, 2005 in People
:) Thought I would throw the PG rating up there. By shirtless shots I mean male. Never really tried a shot like this other than one I did for a challenge a long time ago...and really that was different anyway. So I was wondering if anyone had some good tips they could lend me.

Heres a few that I came up with, I really havn't done much with these shots at all.

Comments

  • coldclimbcoldclimb Registered Users Posts: 1,169 Major grins
    edited December 10, 2005
    I personally try to get some good contrast to show definition. Given that my lighting equipment consists of one flourescent desk lamp, I'm often forced to use darkness and shadow as my primary tools in images like this. But then I haven't shot a whole lot of shirtless pics, and all self portraits. For some reason it would be a bit strange to me shooting someone ELSE striking muscle poses shirtless. yelrotflmao.gif
    John Borland
    www.morffed.com
  • PrezwoodzPrezwoodz Registered Users Posts: 1,147 Major grins
    edited December 10, 2005
    kNow what you mean. It was hard enough for me to do it of myself and post it.
  • PrezwoodzPrezwoodz Registered Users Posts: 1,147 Major grins
    edited December 12, 2005
    Anyone have any comments here I can use? I have tried shooting in less light but the shot never really seems to come out right.
  • thegreeneggthegreenegg Registered Users Posts: 551 Major grins
    edited December 14, 2005
    I want to see what else you have. Do you have anymore or a link?
    I think the thing to do is always try different poses when you start the timer again. That's what I always get stuck doing... striking the same pose, but to keep it entertaining for yourself you must, and you might find different angles that work best.
    I think the contrast idea mentioned above would be good. The lighting on these shoots is kinda dull and that takes away some.
    I really just want more to look at and decide what other angles you could try. I've not done these types of pictures on myself and besides guys are more about that tough lines then the curves.
    Good job!
    Ashley
    Green is the way to be!
    ashleyharding.smugmug.com
  • ScottMcLeodScottMcLeod Registered Users Posts: 753 Major grins
    edited December 14, 2005
    Looks like you shot this with a flash/strobe or fairly high intensity front light.

    Coming from my experience of lighting design for dance, "shaping light" (also known as "Sexy sidelight" will really bring out the form and accentuate the shape. slight top/backlight will give you an annonymous (as the face can dissappear) sihlouette with some light still, and footlight from any angle will give you the appearance of floating.

    If you are shooting with on-camera flash, try getting an off-camera cable.

    If you're using studio lights, move them around! Play, have fun. Use red filters, then convert to B&W. It'll really accentuate the shadows.
    - Scott
    http://framebyframe.ca
    [Bodies] Canon EOS 20D - Canon EOS 500
    [Lenses] Sigma APO 70-200 f/2.8 - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 - Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 - Tamron XR Di 28-75mm f/2.8 - Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
    [Flash] Sigma EF500 Super DG Flash
    [Tripod]
    Manfrotto 055 Pro Black
    [Head] 484RC2, 200RC2
  • PrezwoodzPrezwoodz Registered Users Posts: 1,147 Major grins
    edited December 14, 2005
    thanks scott and ashley! I will experiment with some of those suggestions and see what I can come up with!
  • coldclimbcoldclimb Registered Users Posts: 1,169 Major grins
    edited December 15, 2005
    Just for some content to this thread I'll post up this shot from a year or two back. I lit this with a desk lamp and computer monitor in a dark room, then did some erasing of the background in post, and of course some contrast edits. I feel this shot was a success. Self portraits keep getting tougher for me though, I always seem to run out of new ideas.

    shirtlesshadow.jpg
    John Borland
    www.morffed.com
  • gusgus Registered Users Posts: 16,209 Major grins
    edited December 15, 2005
    Its a difficult shot i recon. I think CC got it right as you really need hard sharp lines & good B&W tonings. I know very very little about tech for it but tried it once....this was lit with one tiny little 18 cent red LED. This shot was focused & then i got in front of the camera hence the shot isnt so sharp.

    The human form is a fasinating thing to shoot i think but it crosses into some areas that others do not understand.

    41002071-M.jpg
  • PrezwoodzPrezwoodz Registered Users Posts: 1,147 Major grins
    edited December 17, 2005
    Figured I would just post in here instead of starting a new thread for such a picture. Thanks for the comments! :) I need better lighting I recon. I think it created more noise because my lighting was just from a computer monitor and I had a 4 second shutter. I was working more on seeing if I could get more definition out though.

    All comments well appreciated!
  • PrezwoodzPrezwoodz Registered Users Posts: 1,147 Major grins
    edited December 18, 2005
    Here is one more. I noticed that since I put the shutter on longer it made the shot have a lot more noise. Are there any easy ways of correcting this other than having better ligthing? is this a normal amount of noise for 4'' shutter opening on a point and shoot? Even though it is supposed to be 9mp I still don't see a difference. I am hoping that the outdoor photo's show the real pixels umph.gif

    meindark2.jpg
  • coldclimbcoldclimb Registered Users Posts: 1,169 Major grins
    edited December 18, 2005
    Prezwoodz wrote:
    Here is one more. I noticed that since I put the shutter on longer it made the shot have a lot more noise. Are there any easy ways of correcting this other than having better ligthing? is this a normal amount of noise for 4'' shutter opening on a point and shoot? Even though it is supposed to be 9mp I still don't see a difference. I am hoping that the outdoor photo's show the real pixels umph.gif

    It's such a dark picture that I can hardly see any noise. You definitely need to get more/better light first and foremost. You shouldn't have to use a four second exposure to get a good shot.
    John Borland
    www.morffed.com
Sign In or Register to comment.