canon 60 d lenses
Hi guys,
I,m looking to buy a canon 60 d dslr with the standard 18 - 55 mm lens. I was also looking at purchasing an addtitional lens . I would mostly be using my dslr to shoot wildlife, scenery etc during treks , and i am also looking to click pics for my family functions as well. Could u suggest some good lenses ?
I,m looking to buy a canon 60 d dslr with the standard 18 - 55 mm lens. I was also looking at purchasing an addtitional lens . I would mostly be using my dslr to shoot wildlife, scenery etc during treks , and i am also looking to click pics for my family functions as well. Could u suggest some good lenses ?
0
Comments
Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM
Both are excellent image quality and together cover a very wide range of FOV as well as wide amount of subject matter and scenes.
If too pricey:
Tamron SP AF17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical [IF]
Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro
... both in Canon EOS mount, of course.
If you intend to use the "kit" lens for your standard zoom, the:
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II
... is fairly similar in image quality and pretty cheap too. Not the best but not too bad either.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
--Ian
The Canon 70-200L can't be beat, but, if you don't absolutely need the f2.8, the f4L IS model is much less expensive and the f4L non-IS even more so. Super easy to handle and transport compared to the f2.8L and very available, used.
Noob, for wild-life you probably want something longer than 200mm.
Add another vote for the 70-200L f4 non-is. I HATED selling that lens as it was near-perfect - lightweight and sharp sharp sharp. (I only sold it to fund purchase of the 70-200 II - which was definitely the right decision for me - but I so miss the smaller, lighter sibling!)
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM is probalby the best in terms of image quality, but expensive and heavy. You may wanna consider Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L too. Sigma and Tamron are great alternative to Canon, if the budget is tight.
I agree with the others, one of the 70-200 versions is good although for most wildlife you will eventually want more focal length.
For wildlife we use a 70-300L and a 100-400L
Nick.
my equipment: Canon 5D2, 7D, full list here
my Smugmug site: here
the 40mm pancake is good, probably better for full frame models than crops
I have a 40mm f/2.8 lens which I use on my 1.6x cameras and I find the focal length pretty darn awkward. It is neither wide enough nor long enough but, somewhere in between.
The only nice things about it are the price and the size.