Fraid I don't upload to the gallery here but just link them from my flickr gallery.
I gather though that photos can only be 800px wide max.
Brian V.
I thought it was more than that? Your image here Lacewing #2 by Lord V, on Flickr
is 957 px long-side on FLICKR. When viewed here on Smug http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=241779 the image info also shows it at 957px. I looked at a few of mine and they appear to vary. Some of them give the original FLICKR size but then say 'rescaled to...' others are just left as they are. Does any one from Smug know what happens?
I thought it was more than that? Your image here Lacewing #2 by Lord V, on Flickr
is 957 px long-side on FLICKR. When viewed here on Smug http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=241779 the image info also shows it at 957px. I looked at a few of mine and they appear to vary. Some of them give the original FLICKR size but then say 'rescaled to...' others are just left as they are. Does any one from Smug know what happens?
800 px is the limit for attached images.
The limit for embedded (ie linked images) is much bigger (not sure what It actually is) but images may be dynamically resized depending on the browser window size.
Brian v.
... but images may be dynamically resized depending on the browser window size.
Brian v.
Yes, I think so. If I resize my window from full size to a smaller size by dragging a corner, the 'rescaled to...' figure gets less. That presumably is just the browser doing that. I've never tried loading a much larger size image to here. Would be useful for macro images to zoom in and see details? You can do that on FLICKR if the image has a large size uploaded
I thought it was more than that? Your image here Lacewing #2 by Lord V, on Flickr
is 957 px long-side on FLICKR. When viewed here on Smug http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=241779 the image info also shows it at 957px. I looked at a few of mine and they appear to vary. Some of them give the original FLICKR size but then say 'rescaled to...' others are just left as they are. Does any one from Smug know what happens?
Comments
Welcome- hopefully you've found the right place.
Brian v.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
Thanks. I've tried adding some images and I've resized to the lowest quality. Still too large. Perhaps I'm missing something?
I gather though that photos can only be 800px wide max.
Brian V.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
I thought it was more than that? Your image here
Lacewing #2 by Lord V, on Flickr
is 957 px long-side on FLICKR. When viewed here on Smug http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=241779 the image info also shows it at 957px. I looked at a few of mine and they appear to vary. Some of them give the original FLICKR size but then say 'rescaled to...' others are just left as they are. Does any one from Smug know what happens?
'Respectful' there's a word from the past But I'm sure you will find it here. Welcome to you!.
800 px is the limit for attached images.
The limit for embedded (ie linked images) is much bigger (not sure what It actually is) but images may be dynamically resized depending on the browser window size.
Brian v.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
Thanks for the welcome!
Love the Lacewing!