Todays gal and sister.

HackboneHackbone Registered Users Posts: 4,027 Major grins
edited December 17, 2013 in People
Love the lashes on these two gals....they are real.

1. i-KWXzjTW-X2.jpg

2. i-vNf4jdj-X2.jpg

3. i-hqhWstC-X2.jpg

Comments

  • FoquesFoques Registered Users Posts: 1,951 Major grins
    edited December 2, 2013
    man, I absolutely love the last one!!
    I've been searching for a light like this since you posted a set a while back; alas with no luck.
    Arseny - the too honest guy.
    My Site
    My Facebook
  • StueveShotsStueveShots Registered Users Posts: 544 Major grins
    edited December 2, 2013
    I really love #2. Stunning!
  • HackboneHackbone Registered Users Posts: 4,027 Major grins
    edited December 2, 2013
    Arseny, this isn't the traditional ring light I use but it will work. I use this one for the floating O light effect. Just get yourself a 16 inch 40 watt daylight circle tube light and ballast from any general lighting store maybe even Lowes or HomeDepot. $40 to 50ish should do it, maybe even less. Nothing special. It's not my idea, I stole that one from a gentleman out in Chicago.

    1. i-FJ6Qvm3-L.jpg

    2. i-WKVcbrn-XL.jpg

    Hope that helps.

    PS Don't forget to tape the bulb to the plug or else it will fall off in front of your subject and break into twelve thousand pieces.
  • FoquesFoques Registered Users Posts: 1,951 Major grins
    edited December 2, 2013
    oh wow! that's totally different from what I thought I was looking for! :D

    Thank you very much Charles! I think i'm going to make me one of those this weekend. and I have a new project now.. going to try and see if I can make one like that that is portable and can be touched by bare hands..
    Arseny - the too honest guy.
    My Site
    My Facebook
  • BilsenBilsen Registered Users Posts: 2,143 Major grins
    edited December 2, 2013
    I'm headed for Home Depot tomorrow Hack.

    Nice work.
    Bilsen (the artist formerly known as John Galt NY)
    Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
    24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
    Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
    Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen
  • David_S85David_S85 Administrators Posts: 13,249 moderator
    edited December 3, 2013
    That second shot is wonderfully unique. Winner.
    My Smugmug
    "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
  • HackboneHackbone Registered Users Posts: 4,027 Major grins
    edited December 3, 2013
    Arsne, this one does not get hot, it can be held.
  • Bryce WilsonBryce Wilson Registered Users Posts: 1,586 Major grins
    edited December 3, 2013
    Number two is just the coolest!!!!

    Should be used with ad copy for something...

    clap.gifclapclap.gifclapclap.gifclapclap.gifclapclap.gifclap

    Did you add the "swish" in the lower left of her eye in post or position a reflector there to add it naturally?
  • HackboneHackbone Registered Users Posts: 4,027 Major grins
    edited December 3, 2013
    Did both Bryce. Used an "eyelighter" and then dodged it more.
  • Bryce WilsonBryce Wilson Registered Users Posts: 1,586 Major grins
    edited December 3, 2013
    Hackbone wrote: »
    Did both Bryce. Used an "eyelighter" and then dodged it more.

    Nice. To me, anything that reduces post work is a beautiful thing and that image certainly is!

    Not sure what an "eyelighter" is, but am assuming it's a type of reflector.
  • StueveShotsStueveShots Registered Users Posts: 544 Major grins
    edited December 4, 2013
    I so agree with the others...number 2 is amazing!

    May I ask a question? I also want to try that ring light (what a cool shot!), but I don't care for the ring reflections in her eyes...for my taste, it is a bit intense and alien-looking. Did you enhance those highlights in your post-processing? Or are the highlights bound to be that intense no matter what given the set-up?
  • HackboneHackbone Registered Users Posts: 4,027 Major grins
    edited December 4, 2013
    That is the effect a ring light gives. You can lessen it somewhat by moving it back but the effect is still a ring.
  • puzzledpaulpuzzledpaul Registered Users Posts: 1,621 Major grins
    edited December 4, 2013
    Superb job with #2 - expression / colours / composition etc - congrats :)

    pp
  • StueveShotsStueveShots Registered Users Posts: 544 Major grins
    edited December 4, 2013
    Thanks, Charles. I figured so, I just didn't know if you had heightened the effect in post. Darn. I love it otherwise...such a clever idea!
  • HackboneHackbone Registered Users Posts: 4,027 Major grins
    edited December 4, 2013
    https://www.pinterest.com/pin/65020788340108513/

    this is the version I have but one generation before this. slight difference on how it is attached. Some folks try to make their own but the material, the angles all come into play over home made versions of even a tri flector.

    How it is lighted also comes into play.
  • kobistarkobistar Registered Users Posts: 109 Major grins
    edited December 6, 2013
    I like all of them. good work
  • zoomerzoomer Registered Users Posts: 3,688 Major grins
    edited December 11, 2013
    1 has some turbo processing...when the nose/jawline starts to disappear you know it is to much.
    2 is a bit up the nose...overprocessed as well.
    I like 3 that is a fun shot, she looks engaged.
  • QarikQarik Registered Users Posts: 4,959 Major grins
    edited December 17, 2013
    2 is perfection except for the up nose!
    D700, D600
    14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
    85 and 50 1.4
    45 PC and sb910 x2
    http://www.danielkimphotography.com
Sign In or Register to comment.