Precocious
Bryce Wilson
Registered Users Posts: 1,586 Major grins
Spent a few days at the NAS in Pensacola. (Shout out to the boys at the CPO club)
Ran into a young lady on the beach that can best be described as precocious. She was a real firecracker!
Here are a couple. Shot with a D700 paired with a 35-70 2.8.
1.
2.
3.
Ran into a young lady on the beach that can best be described as precocious. She was a real firecracker!
Here are a couple. Shot with a D700 paired with a 35-70 2.8.
1.
2.
3.
0
Comments
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
grt,boco.
It's called "Sugar Sand Beach" for a reason!
Note to Bilsen:
As an example of what your were asking in your "New Lens" thread.
All three images were taken at 70mm and 2.8. F4 wouldn't have had the same background blur at 70mm.
Cutie indeed! (And I'm impressed by your Dutch
But if he went from his Rebel to a 6D and kept his 24-105/4, he would get that extra stop of blur.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Good point, but, I have found that digital camera body's become "obsolete" in three to five years. Top end glass lasts forever!
Case in point:
The lens used in these images was produced in 1994. It cost around 600.00. The version Nikon is selling today (24-70mm 2.8afs) is only marginally better, not built as well/tough and costs 1750.00.
Anyone still using a digital body they bought back in 1994?
Well, sort of. AF motors die, and after a certain number of years you can't get them fixed any more. Also I think Rebel to 6D is a significant enough upgrade. It would be a bigger upgrade than selling his 24-105L for a 24-70L. So it would kill several birds with one stone - more bg blur, more ISO, bigger vf, new body, etc. The difference in IQ will make it feel like all his lenses are new again.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
http://www.studio-liorit.co.il
מתנה מקורית