HS SP: Nate

Jeremy_22 · December 24, 2013

Had a blast with Nate - local basketball star that is headed to Pepperdine next season on scholarship.

Finished result was a 10x10 album from McKenna with their custom photo cover.

Link to full album: http://www.flickr.com/photos/iclickphotography/sets/72157636060377126/

zoomer · December 27, 2013

inconsistent lighting, blown whites, over use of tilts. I do like that you try to get out of the box and shoot some different ideas with them...some creative ideas.
The big dunk is a cool idea.
Pretty much the same issues with your other set of the girl. Especially with shots on one page in a similar theme the lighting should be consistent.
The potential is there...just work on the technical issues.

Jeremy_22 · January 2, 2014

zoomer wrote: »

inconsistent lighting, blown whites, over use of tilts.
The potential is there...just work on the technical issues.

lulz

D3Sshooter · January 3, 2014

Well lets say that it is different, and if one likes it or not is a matter of taste. I did see a couple of great shot in the set, but I also see others.
The collage for instance, as a whole a complete mismatch of light temperatures and a very odd color palette. In fact I think it has no taste, but then again that is an emotion. There are shots that work , like the cold blue tint on the right, if seen outside the collage. The second picture is nice in terms op composition and expression, technically it is not right, such as highlights, skin color differences, burned or close to burned out spots with a light source that is overpowered on the left (viewer). Of course it is hard to judge the technical correctness and craftsmanship if we don't get to see the original picture. I have a guts feeling that it won't be that good. Anyhow, that is just my old school view on things.
The last picture I do like, in terms op composition . Not in terms of technical approach, the lights are just to distracting and unreal as the stands are visible. The action is great.
Overall I would say, a good attempt but you need to get the light under control.

Jeremy_22 · January 4, 2014

The "collage" spread of basketball shots actually do match. 2 color portraits of the same processing, 2 b/w images on either side match and then the separate duo tones b/w image in the middle. It's all about compliment/contrast in the scope of the design. Light is completely consistent in the set as the setup for those remained the same - all about movement of the subject.

What many "photogs" don't understand that shoot/burn or only shoot for web - the print comes up slightly darker than what is seen on a backlit monitor - even when it's calibrated (which ours are monthly). Also, if you study any of the Nike/Gatorade sports ad style - you'll see very strong highlights and shifts in color. This is what draws clients to our studio.

Light control is exactly what we were looking for. In the outdoor action portraits, we had 3 strobes and it is real. 2 are seen as the broad edge lights and one main in a softbox. Stars in the sky also real as this was shot just before dusk to pull in the stars.

As a CPP, I have a pretty good idea of light control and when to use different lighting styles to my advantage.

Earache · January 4, 2014

dsmPhotoCompany wrote: »

lulz

I had to Google this term, and when I did, it occurred to me to offer you a friendly suggestion:

If you do not wish to receive C&C on your work, state as much in your original post - it is customary on this forum
for the numerous excellent photographers here to to offer expert constructive criticism as a mode for sharing and learning.

anonymouscuban · January 4, 2014

Earache wrote: »

I had to Google this term, and when I did, it occurred to me to offer you a friendly suggestion:

If you do not wish to receive C&C on your work, state as much in your original post - it is customary on this forum
for the numerous excellent photographers here to to offer expert constructive criticism as a mode for sharing and learning.

I've come to a few conclusions about you, over time, DSM.

You're a Rockstar Pro
You rarely have time, if ever, to post on any thread you did not create.
You don't care for our pedestrian tastes, unless, of course, we love your photo.

If you don't care for our critique of your photos and you don't have time to contribute to other member's posts, then why post on this forum at all?

I understand the need to "get your work out there" but there are other places much better suited for that. Flickr is a great place to post work to get thousands of "views" and those "great shot" comments we all love to get. Google Plus is also good for this type of attention too. I use both for exactly this purpose but come to Dgrin for real feedback and to help out others with their progression.

Just a thought.

Jeremy_22 · January 4, 2014

simply not true cuban - I have offered a number of input/feedback - including providing details on how we created a portrait - both in this forum and via PM. It is true over the last year or so my time has been very limited to spend on the site to offer input. I'm not a hobbiest and run a busy studio - as well as lots of work travel.

I will respond to incorrect c/c. Especially when it comes from a source that clearly has the flaws in their work that they attempted to claim was in what was posted here.

I'm all for proper c/c - when it's accurate.

zoomer · January 6, 2014

Seems you are a legend in your own mind. You have potential but until you get past your ego and open your mind to constructive criticizm your work will suffer technically.
lulz, really....how old are you?

michaelglenn · January 8, 2014

I'm gonna chime in having read the comments and such.

There is nothing wrong with disagreeing with critiques. Some of the things we do are "intentional" for our own branding. It gives us that "unique" style that separates us from other photographers.

However, in this case, you are putting yourself on a pedestal. You laughed at zoomer's critique, rather than saying something constructive, or just being open to listening. Everyone has a right to their own views, whether it's "right or wrong".

As for my own views of your work, I dig it. I think what you are doing is really cool, and I like the options you give to senior high school students. I'm positive the work you do attracts student's every year because your work is "modern" and "cool". The way you use lighting certainly gives "attitude", which makes this population feel a connection to your photographs. My nits? You use a lot of different tones (particularly 1st and 3rd images). I think this doesn't mesh as well for album design. The same goes with the lighting. Some images look more overpowered by light, while others, not so much. Do my nits mean that I'm bashing your work? Not one bit. Do I think those changes could take your work to the next level? You bet.

Do you have to agree with me? Nope. I just want you to respect my opinion, as well as others here at Dgrin.

HS SP: Nate

Comments