Then.... and now

divamum

Some of you may recall a shoot I did a couple of years ago.

This lad's career has blossomed since then, and he contacted me to schedule a repeat shoot. I knew he'd made some changes, but this was the first time I'd seen him since that last time and WOW! He must have lost 150lbs or more.

Then


Now:

LoganH

Outstanding shots....and outstanding progress by this guy!!! Great work on both sides!

Bryce Wilson

Both the photographer and the model have made really nice progress!

divamum

Thanks, both! Bryce, while it's nice to think I've improved, this chap has not only lost weight, but grown in confidence as he's matured and started reaping some success. It was great to be part of capturing that!

Bryce Wilson

divamum wrote: »

Thanks, both! Bryce, while it's nice to think I've improved, this chap has not only lost weight, but grown in confidence as he's matured and started reaping some success. It was great to be part of capturing that!

While he certainly deserves some or even a lot of credit, don't sell your improvements short. Those of us that have been around a while can certainly see it.

michaelglenn

It's really awesome to see how much you've improved as a photographer, as well as this guy's lifestyle changes! Nice shots

divamum

Aw, thanks guys. I also credit moving to full-frame. In my "studio" (aka living room) losing the crop factor makes a big difference to what I can achieve. I also now use a simple lighting setup by CHOICE rather than necessity; yesterday confirmed my love for 1 sb + large reflector if I'm forced to shoot indoors. It just WORKS.

Also, a shout out to the 35mm - I will never again listen to the "it sucks for portraits" mantra. That left hand shot was taken with it. Not only is the Sigma a JOY to use (it will undoubtedly be my go-to standard/wide lens), but, to my surprise, I LOVE the focal length!! Obviously, not for head and shoulders or when trying to compress and isolate against a background, or if shooting too close etc etc, but if you can use the distortion (here to elongate his body) it is TERRIFIC. I can't say enough good things about the Sigma - anybody who has been considering it, just do it. Terrific lens.

kdotaylor

Nice!

divamum

Thanks KD!!

LoganH

Divamum, the images I just posted in this forum titled Michelle Persek....were all taken with the Sigma 35mm that you are speaking of. While there is distortion it is very minimal and can be fixed in post. I love the lens and it very rarely comes off of my camera! In fact, the last 14 images on my flickr were all taken with it. http://www.flickr.com/photos/logan_hickle/

Bryce Wilson

divamum wrote: »

Also, a shout out to the 35mm - I will never again listen to the "it sucks for portraits" mantra. That left hand shot was taken with it.

Half and three quarter portraits, as this one is, is one thing. Bust shots and head shots are another. Just my two cents.