Playing with daffodils part 2

Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
edited February 5, 2014 in Holy Macro
More daffodil shots taken at higher mags. All focus stacked using zerene.
Brian V.

12273846203_5fbb2de2b9_o.jpg

12273846483_5e0f55a3f2_o.jpg

12283520766_b4df7c3757_o.jpg

12283520786_672fcd2ae5_o.jpg

12283520796_fddebe0313_o.jpg


Cross-eye stereogram
12273846523_2754b5b45d_b.jpg
Brian V.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/

Comments

  • StumblebumStumblebum Registered Users Posts: 8,480 Major grins
    edited February 3, 2014
    Even better Brian! Only you can top you! Cheers!
  • lifeinfocuslifeinfocus Registered Users Posts: 1,461 Major grins
    edited February 3, 2014
    Great! Have you done daylilies like this?

    Phil
    http://www.PhilsImaging.com
    "You don't take a photograph, you make it." ~Ansel Adams
    Phil
  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited February 4, 2014
    Thanks for the comments SB and Phil - appreciated :)

    Phil - no, not done day lillies - any particular reason for asking ?
    Brian V.
    Brian V.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
    http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
  • DeeBugDeeBug Registered Users Posts: 487 Major grins
    edited February 4, 2014
    Great images Brian!

    Davy
  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited February 5, 2014
    DeeBug wrote: »
    Great images Brian!

    Davy

    Thanks Davy :):
    Brian V.
    Brian V.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
    http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
  • lifeinfocuslifeinfocus Registered Users Posts: 1,461 Major grins
    edited February 5, 2014
    Lord Vetinari wrote: »
    Thanks for the comments SB and Phil - appreciated :)

    Phil - no, not done day lillies - any particular reason for asking ?
    Brian V.

    I ask because my wife is an avid daylily gardener and I take lots of daylily photos every year. I have gotten better over the years capturing them, but I have not used the methods you have like with the above flower.

    There are over 60,000 registered daylilies in the US, which means there lots of photos on web but most are not high quality.

    Thanks
    Phil
    http://www.PhilsImaging.com
    "You don't take a photograph, you make it." ~Ansel Adams
    Phil
  • StumblebumStumblebum Registered Users Posts: 8,480 Major grins
    edited February 5, 2014
    Brian did you use anything to back light #1 and #3? Are the remaining lit up because of the flash? Would love some more info on how you managed the lighting. Thanks
  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited February 5, 2014
    Stumblebum wrote: »
    Brian did you use anything to back light #1 and #3? Are the remaining lit up because of the flash? Would love some more info on how you managed the lighting. Thanks

    #1 LED bar light from below

    #2 mainly natural light from window on left but some room light from above

    #3 LED light

    #4&5 full flash

    The non flash shots were fairly long exposures - 0.3 to 3 secs I think in TV mode

    Brian V.
    Brian V.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
    http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
  • StumblebumStumblebum Registered Users Posts: 8,480 Major grins
    edited February 5, 2014
    Lord Vetinari wrote: »
    #1 LED bar light from below

    #2 mainly natural light from window on left but some room light from above

    #3 LED light

    #4&5 full flash

    The non flash shots were fairly long exposures - 0.3 to 3 secs I think in TV mode

    Brian V.

    Thanks much!!
Sign In or Register to comment.