Long zoom birds

Paul IddonPaul Iddon Registered Users Posts: 5,129 Major grins
edited February 11, 2014 in Wildlife
These few were all taken at the top end of a Sigma 150-500, with the cormorants one also using a 1.4x extender. All the subjects were a very long way away (except the blue tit which was just 40 yards from me) and are cropped for these results:


Blue Tit:

1080bt1aEDIT.jpg


Cormorants & Gulls:

1080cormorants.jpg


Heron:

heron11.jpg


Dipper:

1080dipper.jpg


Paul.


Link to my personal website: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk






Comments

  • StumblebumStumblebum Registered Users Posts: 8,480 Major grins
    edited February 9, 2014
    #1 rocks!thumb.gif
  • Paul IddonPaul Iddon Registered Users Posts: 5,129 Major grins
    edited February 9, 2014
    Stumblebum wrote: »
    #1 rocks!thumb.gif

    The most common bird the best eh? Hehehhe :)


    Cheers Stumble thumb.gif


    Paul.


    Link to my personal website: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk






  • StumblebumStumblebum Registered Users Posts: 8,480 Major grins
    edited February 9, 2014
    Paul Iddon wrote: »
    The most common bird the best eh? Hehehhe :)


    Cheers Stumble thumb.gif


    Paul.

    First, I didn't know it was common. Got so many cool shades and beautiful eyes and pattern around the neck. Second, if we only go by rare, it would be hard to be a wild-life photographer, unless you happen to be a park ranger or something. I love the shot completely, the way it is framed, and how it is looking down from up top and artsy too! I love #4 also, only wish dipper was looking to its left, as its beak is getting lost in the background, losing the separation from rest of the body, which caused me to hold back my effusive praise! Keep em coming!
  • Paul IddonPaul Iddon Registered Users Posts: 5,129 Major grins
    edited February 9, 2014
    Thanks again, youre very generous. :-)


    Paul.


    Link to my personal website: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk






  • puzzledpaulpuzzledpaul Registered Users Posts: 1,621 Major grins
    edited February 9, 2014
    Paul Iddon wrote: »
    The most common bird the best eh? ...

    Well, I'd much rather see (and try to get) decent pictures of supposedly common subjects than pics of more exotic species that rely more on the species' 'wow' factor rather than basic pic / image qualities / considerations.

    Already commented on 1 - as regards the others
    3, 4 would be better from a lower pov
    in 3 it'd get rid of the water streak and help to control both the bg and fg, but probably wouldn't get rid of the 'hand of man' bg element.
    4 would be a rather different pic altogether - especially with a better pose (as prev. mentioned)

    2 is way too busy for my tastes, with no real focus of attention ... + messy fg.

    All imo, of course ...

    pp
  • bristleconebristlecone Registered Users Posts: 451 Major grins
    edited February 10, 2014
    #1 is tops for me. Nice.
  • Paul IddonPaul Iddon Registered Users Posts: 5,129 Major grins
    edited February 10, 2014
    Cheers fella, much appreciate your thoughts & comments.

    Quick edit of No.1:

    1080_Blue_Tit_named_edit_small.jpg


    Paul.


    Link to my personal website: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk






  • StumblebumStumblebum Registered Users Posts: 8,480 Major grins
    edited February 10, 2014
    Wow! #1 looks much better after edit!! Sharper, clearer, without going overboard. What tool did you use to get rid of part of the branch so cleanly? What else was changed. Thanks!
  • Paul IddonPaul Iddon Registered Users Posts: 5,129 Major grins
    edited February 11, 2014
    I used the clone content aware spot healing brush. clone tool, and patch tool for larger areas, painting over the branches. Over the crossing part of the branch, I just copied and pasted bits of other branch parts. Curves and saturation to finish.


    Paul.


    Link to my personal website: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk






Sign In or Register to comment.