Page Nav IE11

AllenAllen Registered Users Posts: 10,013 Major grins
edited March 18, 2014 in Bug Reporting
Smugmug style gallery
I just unveiled and noticed the multiple page nav does not show. You can click on the spot
and the drop appears. Firefox shows ok.

Dragging my mouse over the area highlights all but no indication of a drop.
Al - Just a volunteer here having fun
My Website index | My Blog

Comments

  • LindyLindy Registered Users Posts: 202 Major grins
    edited February 14, 2014
    Hey Allen,

    I just viewed your site in Firefox, Chrome and in Safari on my Mac. All three browsers display the dropdowns when you hover over a link that has the indicators (>>). I had two other heroes check on their PCs. IE11 was fine, but he did say they appeared faster in Firefox. Chrome was also okay, and still faster than IE11.

    I'm sorry, but we're not able to replicate a problem. Can you try clearing your browser cache, and see if that solves your problems? If not, we'll need details of which browser(s) and versions are failing you.

    Thanks!
    Lindy
    Support Hero
  • AllenAllen Registered Users Posts: 10,013 Major grins
    edited February 14, 2014
    Lindy wrote: »
    Hey Allen,

    I just viewed your site in Firefox, Chrome and in Safari on my Mac. All three browsers display the dropdowns when you hover over a link that has the indicators (>>). I had two other heroes check on their PCs. IE11 was fine, but he did say they appeared faster in Firefox. Chrome was also okay, and still faster than IE11.

    I'm sorry, but we're not able to replicate a problem. Can you try clearing your browser cache, and see if that solves your problems? If not, we'll need details of which browser(s) and versions are failing you.

    Thanks!
    Lindy
    Support Hero
    Win7 IE 11.0.9600.16518 Update Version 11.0.3
    I had just cleared everything in IE couple hours ago.

    Not to mention we need << >> first and last page picks
    Al - Just a volunteer here having fun
    My Website index | My Blog
  • AllenAllen Registered Users Posts: 10,013 Major grins
    edited March 14, 2014
    Allen wrote: »
    Win7 IE 11.0.9600.16518 Update Version 11.0.3
    I had just cleared everything in IE couple hours ago.

    Not to mention we need << >> first and last page picks
    I've now lost the drop in Firefox also. It looks like the left image in my last post for IE. It works if
    you click spot.
    Al - Just a volunteer here having fun
    My Website index | My Blog
  • phaserbeamphaserbeam Registered Users Posts: 452 Major grins
    edited March 14, 2014
    Allen wrote: »
    I've now lost the drop in Firefox also. It looks like the left image in my last post for IE. It works if you click spot.

    Yes... same here.
  • AllenAllen Registered Users Posts: 10,013 Major grins
    edited March 14, 2014
    Lindy wrote: »
    ...hover over a link that has the indicators (>>) ...
    Perhaps they need to fix our window machines like your Mac's. I only see one ">".
    Win7 IE and FF
    Al - Just a volunteer here having fun
    My Website index | My Blog
  • moirainemoiraine Registered Users Posts: 123 Major grins
    edited March 17, 2014
    Allen,

    this css in your "all gallery pages" css is breaking your look of the dropdown:


    /* fix the page nav below thumbs */
    .sm-gallery-tiles-pagination-total {
    padding-left:2em;
    }
  • AllenAllen Registered Users Posts: 10,013 Major grins
    edited March 17, 2014
    moiraine wrote: »
    Allen,

    this css in your "all gallery pages" css is breaking your look of the dropdown:


    /* fix the page nav below thumbs */
    .sm-gallery-tiles-pagination-total {
    padding-left:2em;
    }
    Thanks

    But, there still is no indication to visitors that there is a drop to select pages.
    Al - Just a volunteer here having fun
    My Website index | My Blog
  • AllenAllen Registered Users Posts: 10,013 Major grins
    edited March 17, 2014
    Allen wrote: »
    Thanks

    But, there still is no indication to visitors that there is a drop to select pages.
    Had to add my own indication :D
    .sm-fonticon-AngleBracketDown:after{
      content:" << Click numbers to jump pages";
      font-size:50% !important;color:yellow;
    }
    
    .sm-fonticon-AngleBracketDown {
       width: 180px !important; 
    }
    
    Al - Just a volunteer here having fun
    My Website index | My Blog
  • pbandjpbandj Registered Users Posts: 237 Major grins
    edited March 17, 2014
    Allen wrote: »
    Had to add my own indication :D
    .sm-fonticon-AngleBracketDown:after{
      content:" << Click numbers to jump pages";
      font-size:50% !important;color:yellow;
    }
    
    .sm-fonticon-AngleBracketDown {
       width: 180px !important; 
    }
    

    I agree...I've mentioned on multiple occasions that it's very confusing, unintuitive, and inconsistent with the other chevrons that clicking the downward-pointing arrow does nothing. How does a user know to click the numbers (other than your solution, which makes it obvious)?
  • phaserbeamphaserbeam Registered Users Posts: 452 Major grins
    edited March 18, 2014
    Allen wrote: »
    Had to add my own indication :D

    have u tried it on firefox or with a smaller browser window? i get a line-wrapping which really looks funny :D
  • AllenAllen Registered Users Posts: 10,013 Major grins
    edited March 18, 2014
    phaserbeam wrote: »
    have u tried it on firefox or with a smaller browser window? i get a line-wrapping which really looks funny :D
    This might need a little more width for all browsers. Looks ok here in latest FF and IE.

    .sm-fonticon-AngleBracketDown { width: 180px !important; }

    Edit: just checked Screenfly and looked ok in every size, desktop, pad and phones.

    Is your browser zoom at 100%?
    Al - Just a volunteer here having fun
    My Website index | My Blog
  • phaserbeamphaserbeam Registered Users Posts: 452 Major grins
    edited March 18, 2014
    Allen wrote: »
    Is your browser zoom at 100%?

    Yes, here is a complete screenshot. If you want me to remove the screenshot later just send me a PM.

    P.S: I also tried screenfly and i get the same line-wrapping... @ 1024x768 and 1680x1050
  • AllenAllen Registered Users Posts: 10,013 Major grins
    edited March 18, 2014
    phaserbeam wrote: »
    Yes, here is a complete screenshot. If you want me to remove the screenshot later just send me a PM.

    P.S: I also tried screenfly and i get the same line-wrapping... @ 1024x768 and 1680x1050
    I can't reproduce that, what browser are you using?
    I'm on Win7

    Are the keywords wrapping? Don't see them after the icon.
    Al - Just a volunteer here having fun
    My Website index | My Blog
  • phaserbeamphaserbeam Registered Users Posts: 452 Major grins
    edited March 18, 2014
    Allen wrote: »
    I can't reproduce that, what browser are you using?
    I'm on Win7

    Are the keywords wrapping? Don't see them after the icon.

    Linux, FF27, Opera12 and Konqueror. I can see the wrapping on all three browsers. And yes, keywords are wrapping too.

    If i add "white-space:nowrap!important;" it looks better:
  • AllenAllen Registered Users Posts: 10,013 Major grins
    edited March 18, 2014
    phaserbeam wrote: »
    Linux, FF27, Opera12 and Konqueror. I can see the wrapping on all three browsers. And yes, keywords are wrapping too.

    If i add "white-space:nowrap!important;" it looks better:
    Added it, any better?

    I put in
    .sm-fonticon-AngleBracketDown:after {
    content:" << Click numbers to jump pages";
    font-size:50% !important;color:yellow;
    white-space:nowrap!important;
    }
    Al - Just a volunteer here having fun
    My Website index | My Blog
  • phaserbeamphaserbeam Registered Users Posts: 452 Major grins
    edited March 18, 2014
    Allen wrote: »
    Added it, any better?
    Yes, but i don't think this really solves the problem.

    The problem is that you are using a fixed width for the container holding the text. As you can see on the bottom of the screenshot (taken with FireFox and FF WebDev 3D-tools) the container is still not wide enough. There is too much text. The container does not expand automatically. Not sure if that can be done... don't know that much about CSS.

    Also i would think about using different code on different screen sizes... i apply such text on large screens only.
    /* For large screens only  */
    @media only screen and (min-width: 1200px) {
    ...CSS code that applies to screen sizes > 1200px...
    }
    
  • AllenAllen Registered Users Posts: 10,013 Major grins
    edited March 18, 2014
    phaserbeam wrote: »
    Yes, but i don't think this really solves the problem.

    The problem is that you are using a fixed width for the container holding the text. As you can see on the bottom of the screenshot (taken with FireFox and FF WebDev 3D-tools) the container is still not wide enough. There is too much text. The container does not expand automatically. Not sure if that can be done... don't know that much about CSS.

    Also i would think about using different code on different screen sizes... i apply such text on large screens only.
    /* For large screens only  */
    @media only screen and (min-width: 1200px) {
    ...CSS code that applies to screen sizes > 1200px...
    }
    
    Would a min-width help?
    .sm-fonticon-AngleBracketDown:after{
      content:" << Click numbers to jump pages";
      font-size:50% !important;color:yellow;
    }
    
    .sm-fonticon-AngleBracketDown {
       [COLOR=Red]min-width[/COLOR]: 180px !important; 
    }
    
    Maybe also adding max-width would help.
    This should have nothing to do with the keyword wrapping, another problem?
    Al - Just a volunteer here having fun
    My Website index | My Blog
Sign In or Register to comment.