OOYCZ 5 - Pileated Woodpecker
sapphire73
Registered Users, Super Moderators Posts: 1,970 moderator
Here are a few shots I captured the other day of a male pileated woodpecker working on his nest. I am heading out of town again and may not be able to capture more shots of this bird before the trees leaf out (or participate in this challenge). But thought I would share my first attempts.
The nest is behind a neighbor's house and she kindly let me come over, but we are giving them lots of space. (Another photographer saw the male and femaie together, and we are hoping they stick around rather than looking for another place to nest.)
These are shot late afternoon with a 70-300mm lens handheld.
1.
2.
3.
Any tips for shooting and/or processing differently?
Thanks!
The nest is behind a neighbor's house and she kindly let me come over, but we are giving them lots of space. (Another photographer saw the male and femaie together, and we are hoping they stick around rather than looking for another place to nest.)
These are shot late afternoon with a 70-300mm lens handheld.
1.
2.
3.
Any tips for shooting and/or processing differently?
Thanks!
0
Comments
We have those birds in our backyard too. Love to watch them fly and go from tree to tree. Largest North American woodpecker.
"You don't take a photograph, you make it." ~Ansel Adams
Phil
Personal taste ... I prefer the crops where I can't see round the RHS of the tree and the red plant on the RHS in the middle shot is a detraction from the bird in my view - red always pulls the eye - you could crop out or possibly de-saturate the red in this area. Just a thought.
Alan.
PS - The white stuff falling in the first shot is intriguing.
My SmugMug Galleries
Even better! Great capture.
Alan.
"You don't take a photograph, you make it." ~Ansel Adams
Phil
4a.
4b. [Same image with different crop]
5. Another shot of the wood chips being flung out of the nest.
I am leaning toward 4a or 4b as they feel more dynamic to me - even though there aren't any chips in mid-air. But the resolution is pretty low with a tight crop.
I will be overseas without a computer so we'll see whether I'm able to follow through or not.
My SmugMug Galleries
I'm not saying it matters, but the white balance is clearly different in 5 and I think 4 looks more natural.
For me, the tree is also better exposed in No 4.
Alan.
It was fascinating (to me ) that the beak appears closed when the chips are flung and then opens wide.
I am now without computer so I welcome input but won't be able to act on it .
Hope you are seeing very well ASAP!
My SmugMug Galleries
"You don't take a photograph, you make it." ~Ansel Adams
Phil
I wonder if there's another cropping option that might be worth considering / trying, which might also have been what grandmaR was referring to?
A portrait crop of the original #1 image ...
Halve (say) the trunk showing between hole and rhs of frame
A smidge off the top
A bit off the lhs ... just to the right of the largest chip next to lhs frame ... this one tends to get lost in the similarly coloured bg more so than some of the others on darker bg
Bit off bottom to suit desired frame aspect ratio.
Sort of think of trees + woodpeckers as up/down pics, rather than side to side, somehow ... maybe it's just my distorted way of looking at things
If a major interest aspect of the image is the chips being flung, then it's worth playing on that aspect ... even tho' a viewer is possibly unlikely to realise what they are ... unless told, maybe ... as per here?
pp
Flickr
“PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE ‘JAZZ’ FOR THE EYES…”
http://jwear.smugmug.com/
Thanks again for your input throughout this process!
My SmugMug Galleries