Stumblebum wrote: » What lens is this? Exif says 150mm
JulianNell wrote: » Good detail, but it does look a little bit over sharpened.
basflt wrote: » Sigma 150 mm macro info was already included in first post
Stumblebum wrote: » Thanks. I missed it. Was ISO 2000 necessary to get the background to be exposed right?
Comments
info was already included in first post
/ɯoɔ˙ƃnɯƃnɯs˙ʇlɟsɐq//:dʇʇɥ
soft images are good for flowers
for bugs i choose to get it sharp to express the detail
could be a matter of taste though
/ɯoɔ˙ƃnɯƃnɯs˙ʇlɟsɐq//:dʇʇɥ
Thanks. I missed it. Was ISO 2000 necessary to get the background to be exposed right?
flash can not reach very far
therefor i try to use fill-flash on the Nikon when possible , to get a more natural effect
for real close-up , i must use full flash ( ISO 200 or 400 normally )
/ɯoɔ˙ƃnɯƃnɯs˙ʇlɟsɐq//:dʇʇɥ
Paul.
Link to my personal website: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk
Brian v.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
moderator - Holy Macro
Goldenorfe’s Flickr Gallery
Goldenorfe photography on Smugmug
Phils Photographic Adventures Blog