50 mm f1.8 ??????????

illuminati919illuminati919 Registered Users Posts: 713 Major grins
edited December 31, 2005 in Cameras
I shoot alot of sports photography, mostly BMX and sometimes skating, I can usually get really close up if I need to or things like that. Would the 50 mm f1.8 be a good lens to buy ? I'll be using it with my Canon D60.

If anyone has any kinds of opinions please help me out it would be greatly appreciated.

Marko
~~~www.markoknezevic.com~~~

Setup: One camera, one lens, and one roll of film.

Comments

  • gusgus Registered Users Posts: 16,209 Major grins
    edited December 27, 2005
    Great lens for the $ & what you need.
  • ultravoxultravox Registered Users Posts: 776 Major grins
    edited December 27, 2005
    "Would the 50 mm f1.8 be a good lens to buy ?"

    YES It's a good one with good optics. And for the price U pay its a "must have".thumb.gif
    Cristian.
    [SIZE=-1]It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice. - John Lennon.[/SIZE]
  • rahmonsterrahmonster Registered Users Posts: 1,376 Major grins
    edited December 27, 2005
    Getting mine in a couple of weeks. Great all rounder.
    www.tmitchell.smugmug.com

    Art washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life...Picasso
  • DoctorItDoctorIt Administrators Posts: 11,951 moderator
    edited December 27, 2005
    ditto, ditto, and ditto. I've actually never thought of using it for sports, but sure, if you can get up close, it's definitely fast. However, I have to say, it doesn't focus sports-fast. Again, I've never tried it in any sort of action, so I could be wrong.

    But you gotta love that you can go to any camera shop, lay down a c-note and walk away with an awesome piece of glass.
    nod.gif
    Erik
    moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]


  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited December 27, 2005
    DoctorIt wrote:
    ditto, ditto, and ditto. I've actually never thought of using it for sports, but sure, if you can get up close, it's definitely fast. However, I have to say, it doesn't focus sports-fast. Again, I've never tried it in any sort of action, so I could be wrong.


    I don't shoot sports, but I wouldn't rely on the 50 1.8 for sports solely because of the focusing. I have the lens, and I like it a lot, but I don't love it because of the focusing.
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • KA0TVOKA0TVO Registered Users Posts: 164 Major grins
    edited December 27, 2005
    Great lens,
    Check out the FM and the flea market here. Can be found at times for less than $65.00 delending on condition. Got mine used and it's great, very sharp. thumb.gif
    Bob
  • KA0TVOKA0TVO Registered Users Posts: 164 Major grins
    edited December 27, 2005
  • Red BullRed Bull Registered Users Posts: 719 Major grins
    edited December 27, 2005
    I just ordered mine from B&H 2 minutes ago....literally.

    I had some Christmas money so I decided to go ahead and get it since I hear its a must have for the price.
    -Steven

    http://redbull.smugmug.com

    "Money can't buy happiness...But it can buy expensive posessions that make other people envious, and that feels just as good.":D

    Canon 20D, Canon 50 1.8 II, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40 f/4 L, Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro, Canon 430ex.
  • DoctorItDoctorIt Administrators Posts: 11,951 moderator
    edited December 27, 2005
    I may be sticking mine up for sale on flea market soon... waiting to hear back from DanielB, he expressed early interest in it.
    Erik
    moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]


  • JusticeiroJusticeiro Registered Users Posts: 1,177 Major grins
    edited December 27, 2005
    I've had the 50mm f1.8 for about 3 months now- shooting it at f8-f11 is astounding, it's really crisp and beats the kit lens all to hell (not that the kit lens is too bad). My problem with it is that it is simply too long for most of the shooting that I like to do, particularly with my 20d's 1.6 focal length multiplier. I'm thinking about upgrading to the 28mm 2.8.

    However, for low light it will blow your mind, and for the price it may be the best deal out there. Not even worht messing around buying it used.
    Cave ab homine unius libri
  • KA0TVOKA0TVO Registered Users Posts: 164 Major grins
    edited December 27, 2005
    Bob
  • VeluVelu Registered Users Posts: 4 Beginner grinner
    edited December 29, 2005
    It's a great lens for "little" money. Fast (1.8).
    One you should have anyway !

    Rgds
    Velu
  • leebaseleebase Registered Users Posts: 630 Major grins
    edited December 29, 2005
    It's not a great sports lens. It's a good lens at a great price, pretty much a "must have" -- well, unless you pay more for the 50mm f1.4

    The sports prime you might want to consider is the 85mm f1.8 -- now THAT'S a very nice lens, and focuses fast enough for sports, and gives you more reach to boot.

    Lee
  • Matthew SavilleMatthew Saville Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 3,352 Major grins
    edited December 30, 2005
    ACK!!! Fellow BMX etc. photographer here to save the day:

    Do you have a super-wide lens yet? I can HIGHLY reccomend a 12-24mm Nikon DX / Tokina DX, or a Canon 10-22mm EF-S, or a Sigma 10-20mm DC, etc. etc.

    You will find THIS to be your most useful lens BY FAR in the BMX / skate photography scene. In fact, a fisheye is also something you should ownl, only Nikon makes one for DX specifically but usually BMX shooters don't really care too much about the crop on a fisheye lens. Cropping a 15mm circular fisheye by putting it on a 1.5x or 1.6x DSLR is perfect for awesome quarterpipe shots or dirt jumping shots etc. etc.

    Here's some shots at 24mm on a 1.5x Nikon, which is 36mm FOV and REALLY pushing the envelope, I WISH I had a 12-24mm lens so I could get to 18mm FOV...

    32649304-M.jpg

    28008512-M.jpg

    28663128-M.jpg

    28007733-M.jpg

    28004593-M.jpg

    28398118-M.jpg

    35876288-M.jpg

    I don't know about you, but I like to shoot BMX from up close instead of at a distance, with exaggerated perspective. And it's almost impossible to do without a digital-specific super-wide angle lens. So, first and foremost, look into getting a super-wide zoom such as the one's I've mentioned. Tamron also makes an 11-18mm super-wide zoom that is probably perfect for BMX since corner sharpness is NEVER a concern, even stopped down in bright daylight.

    If you already have a super-wide, then I still won't yet reccomend a 50mm focal length prime lens. Not until you have a good zoom that covers that area. Unless, of course, your main interest is shooting in low light without flash. (although with BMX, it's often ALL ABOUT using flash...) If you do want to shoot in low light w/o flash, I'm still going to say you might be better off looking into the wider-angle primes that, when on a cropped DSLR, take you to 50mm or so. The Sigma 30mm f/1.4 is ideal, but expensive for BMX kids. I dunno if you're doing this professionally or just for fun with friends, but I wouldn't invest that much money in just one prime lens if I were the latter. 50mm f/1.8's are a fine thing to own since they're cheap, but for BMX it might prove a little less useful than the wider focal lengths. Just my opinion! At any rate, good luck and happy shooting! Let us know what you end up with...

    Take care,
    -Matt-
    My first thought is always of light.” – Galen Rowell
    My SmugMug PortfolioMy Astro-Landscape Photo BlogDgrin Weddings Forum
  • Matthew SavilleMatthew Saville Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 3,352 Major grins
    edited December 30, 2005
    leebase wrote:
    It's not a great sports lens. It's a good lens at a great price, pretty much a "must have" -- well, unless you pay more for the 50mm f1.4

    The sports prime you might want to consider is the 85mm f1.8 -- now THAT'S a very nice lens, and focuses fast enough for sports, and gives you more reach to boot.

    Lee
    Oh, I forgot about that. If you ARE shooting "from the grandstands" of a BMX event or something, then yes, get an 85mm f/1.8 instead of the 50mm f/1.8. An 85mm lens is awesome for shooting "from the stands". I just assumed you were "in the action" which I guess may not always be the case, and if you're restricted to the sidelines, a super-wide is going to be almost useless... Thanks for reminding me, leebase!

    -Matt-
    My first thought is always of light.” – Galen Rowell
    My SmugMug PortfolioMy Astro-Landscape Photo BlogDgrin Weddings Forum
  • illuminati919illuminati919 Registered Users Posts: 713 Major grins
    edited December 31, 2005
    What do you guys think about the 20mm f2.8 USM ? Now I am interested in that one, thanks for all your tips everyone and especially Matt.
    ~~~www.markoknezevic.com~~~

    Setup: One camera, one lens, and one roll of film.
Sign In or Register to comment.