For number two: lighting, contrast, pov, depth and lines of the three flowers is excellent. The three flowers lead me through the image with the first flower facing, the second back showing, then a third blurred image really intrigues me.
If you don't mind me saying, I think the leaves at the bottom are a little distraction to a most excellent image and wonder how it would look if they were cloned out.
For number two: lighting, contrast, pov, depth and lines of the three flowers is excellent. The three flowers lead me through the image with the first flower facing, the second back showing, then a third blurred image really intrigues me.
If you don't mind me saying, I think the leaves at the bottom are a little distraction to a most excellent image and wonder how it would look if they were cloned out.
Phil
Thanks Phil for the comments- will look at your suggestion
Brian v.
Comments
Davy
Brian v.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
For number two: lighting, contrast, pov, depth and lines of the three flowers is excellent. The three flowers lead me through the image with the first flower facing, the second back showing, then a third blurred image really intrigues me.
If you don't mind me saying, I think the leaves at the bottom are a little distraction to a most excellent image and wonder how it would look if they were cloned out.
Phil
"You don't take a photograph, you make it." ~Ansel Adams
Phil
Thanks Phil for the comments- will look at your suggestion
Brian v.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/