Hi,
I find very intresting your comments and especially that you agree in removing the bird on the left side. For me it gives more background information. So what I did is to go back and do some edits. I can see your comment about removing the bird at the left.. I just wonder how did you think about it? When the extra element adds in the confusion and when it adds more in the story of the background?
I think removing the lower left bird is a good idea for the following reasons. First it is not immediately recognizable as a bird and secondly the viewers eye is pulled to it and lingers trying to figure out what it is. Of the newer edits I prefer #3 because (to my eyes) the white background makes the smaller bird look more in focus than the blueish background.
Comments
I like the sense of motion.
I would clone out the stray piece of bird, lower left, too.
I find very intresting your comments and especially that you agree in removing the bird on the left side. For me it gives more background information. So what I did is to go back and do some edits. I can see your comment about removing the bird at the left.. I just wonder how did you think about it? When the extra element adds in the confusion and when it adds more in the story of the background?
Regards
Alex
P.S The newer edits below
#1
#2
#3
#4
Jack
(My real name is John but Jack'll do)
Alex