When focus does not lock correctly
Hi all,
I was editing today one of my shots and I have noticed that it had a "weird" look. After looking carefully I have found that the focus point was off. Instead of having eyes sharp the focus went even further and I have sharp hair at the back side of the face (Shot at the bottom of the thread)
1. Typically when I go for portraits I used center focusing, as is not that big on my nex camera and shoot it at the face.. something like the nose so I wonder still why my focus ended up so off
2. What is the best way to find that the focus have missed during the "shooting period?".. If I want to keep use the live view ... where should I look to to make sure that I have the right focus? Zooming in all the way to the eye`?
I would like to thank you in advance for your reply
Regards
Alex
I was editing today one of my shots and I have noticed that it had a "weird" look. After looking carefully I have found that the focus point was off. Instead of having eyes sharp the focus went even further and I have sharp hair at the back side of the face (Shot at the bottom of the thread)
1. Typically when I go for portraits I used center focusing, as is not that big on my nex camera and shoot it at the face.. something like the nose so I wonder still why my focus ended up so off
2. What is the best way to find that the focus have missed during the "shooting period?".. If I want to keep use the live view ... where should I look to to make sure that I have the right focus? Zooming in all the way to the eye`?
I would like to thank you in advance for your reply
Regards
Alex
0
Comments
Here's a nice explanation on why focus-recompose can cause issues. http://visual-vacations.com/Photography/focus-recompose_sucks.htm Yes.
Link to my Smugmug site
Thanks a lot
Alex
"Focus recompose" worked "ok" in the film days, but folks were not nearly as critical then, as they are now, with the ability to see images large on their monitors.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
I don't really notice that it is terribly out of focus. Is is not critically sharp in the eyes, yes, but so what, it is still a nice image at the size I see it here on the web. If it was shot with film 30 years ago, most folks would have been perfectly satisfied, unless they were a professional who needed a large print - bigger say than 8 x 10 inches.
Digital lets us be so much more discerning in evaluating our image's technical quality, yet technical quality is not really the most important part of an image. Content, color, composition, and gesture all play a larger role in an image's attractiveness. Sharpness may be important for some images, and for others, not a critical factor. There are countless famous published images of less than stellar technical quality, which still capture the viewer's attention and stimulate an emotional reaction.
I am all for good technical skills and image quality, yet that alone will not create compelling images.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin