Options

Macrophotography Tips and Links 1

2»

Comments

  • Options
    VikingViking Registered Users Posts: 178 Major grins
    edited January 18, 2006
    How far away the target can Ibe to get 1:1 with 50mm, 100mm and 150mm?

    The sigma 150mm is sooooo expensive. headscratch.gif
  • Options
    Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,900 Major grins
    edited January 27, 2006
    Viking wrote:
    How far away the target can Ibe to get 1:1 with 50mm, 100mm and 150mm?

    The sigma 150mm is sooooo expensive. headscratch.gif
    Here is a table of working distance (dist from front of lens to subject at min focus) I pinched from another thread for canon macro lenses
    EF-S 60mm Canon = 10 cm WD @ $440
    EF 100mm Canon = 15 cm WD @ $480
    HSM 150mm Sigma = 20 cm WD @ $620
    180mm Tamron = 26cm WD @ $690
    EF 180mm Canon = 25 cm WD @ $1,300

    For my 105mm sigma lens it's about 12 cms
    Brian V
  • Options
    ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 23,799 moderator
    edited February 18, 2006
    For anybody on a budget, that already has a high-quality digicam (Sony F828, KM A2, for example), you can get a close-focus lens attachment. This little accessory can get you a genuine 1:1 macro capability, and the quality is quite good.

    56773603-M.jpg

    The advantages:

    The accessory lens is fairly inexpensive, ~ $70-$80 USD.
    Digicams have greater DOF per f-stop, better utilization of light.
    Digicams will flash-sync at almost any shutter speed.
    The total cost of a used digicam plus close-focus lens can be less than an equivalent dSLR lens alone.
    The Konica-Minolta A2 has built-in IS, which works with the accessory lens.

    Enough words, here is a sample:

    56773601-M.jpg
    ... and a 100% crop:

    56773597-L.jpg
    The setup:

    56773598-M.jpg

    56783306-M.jpg


    The flash diffusor:

    56773600-M.jpg

    ziggy53
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Options
    wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited February 18, 2006
    thumb.gif
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • Options
    pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,696 moderator
    edited February 19, 2006
    I still use a CoolPix 995 3Mpxl camera for shooting text and flat printed images. The files are easy to edit, and the depth of field just can't be equalled with a DSLR.

    Screw on macro lenses are really just fancy bifocals for your camera and work just fine.

    Canon makes the similar attachments their 58mm, 72mm, and 77mm filter threads as the 250D or the 500D. But they are 2 element lens designs, rather than just a simple plus convex lens.
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • Options
    vicarious1vicarious1 Registered Users Posts: 12 Big grins
    edited March 31, 2009
    Someone on another site asked me to put together some tips on macrophotography of insects- thought it might be of use to people here.
    Brian V.

    Would anyone be so kind and give me an opinion/comment on this photo that what I consider a MACRO for my P&S camera ..Thanks

    http://visualsenses.smugmug.com/gallery/7170513_p2ese#460590890_jCcn2-A-LB

    or any other ...thank you.
    Since there is Light there is Beauty.
Sign In or Register to comment.