Options

Western Yellow Centipede - a Wireworm as I call them, nigh on impossible!

Paul IddonPaul Iddon Registered Users Posts: 5,129 Major grins
edited February 28, 2015 in Holy Macro
They are the thin tiny yellowish wireworms as I called them as a kid, more legs than a millipede, and actually a centipede. But they always move, never in a predictable way either. This is a very small one - probably juvenile, as it was under 2 inches at it's most fully extended. It has about a one millimetre wide body - perhaps double that at the head and tail.

The best I could manage, manually focusing and relying on a light to illuminate where it was at any given moment, these are the best I could manage. Not much, but it gives you an idea of what it is, though I'm sure many of you will recognise it anyway from the pictures of various angles and directions. The photos are not rotated, they were either landscape, or portrait orientation.

This is the longest centipede found in the UK, it is creamy white and up to 70 mm long. It has between 77 and 83 pairs of legs. (It was previously called Haplophilus subterraneus). It is a 'geophilid' centipede which lives mainly in leaf litter but can also be found under stones. Latin mane now Stigmatogaster subterranea.

These are cropped though - a higher mag meant I had nil, zero, zilch chance, so had to dial the mag back a bit.

1080wire01.jpg

1080wire04.jpg

1080wire06.jpg

1080wire02.jpg

1080wire03.jpg

1080wire05.jpg



Paul.


Link to my personal website: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk






Comments

  • Options
    e6filmusere6filmuser Registered Users Posts: 3,378 Major grins
    edited February 28, 2015
    Yes, Paul.

    A readily-available subject in gardens by digging in topsoil or in surface organic matter. If you think they are difficult, try Diplura, found in similar habitats but about the size of Drain Flies and even more active than centipedes. I had what should have been a good session last year but my lens was jammed open wide, instead of at f11 throughout. So the best shot is fit only to show what to look for.

    Harold
  • Options
    Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,900 Major grins
    edited February 28, 2015
  • Options
    GOLDENORFEGOLDENORFE Super Moderators Posts: 4,747 moderator
    edited February 28, 2015
    Fast little creatures arnt they. Lol. Good shots Paul
  • Options
    Paul IddonPaul Iddon Registered Users Posts: 5,129 Major grins
    edited February 28, 2015
    Thanks gents.

    I got as bonus springtail I think it is, in #3.

    Harold, I must look for one of those...

    Paul.


    Link to my personal website: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk






  • Options
    e6filmusere6filmuser Registered Users Posts: 3,378 Major grins
    edited February 28, 2015
    Paul Iddon wrote: »
    Thanks gents.

    I got as bonus springtail I think it is, in #3.

    Harold, I must look for one of those...

    Paul.

    Yes, I was about to mention that when I got called away. An Isotomurus I think.

    Harold
  • Options
    Paul IddonPaul Iddon Registered Users Posts: 5,129 Major grins
    edited February 28, 2015
    e6filmuser wrote: »
    Yes, I was about to mention that when I got called away. An Isotomurus I think.

    Harold

    Thanks Harold - Palustris I assume?

    Paul.


    Link to my personal website: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk






  • Options
    e6filmusere6filmuser Registered Users Posts: 3,378 Major grins
    edited February 28, 2015
    Paul Iddon wrote: »
    Thanks Harold - Palustris I assume?

    Paul.

    Paul,

    I hesitated to go to species, knowing that the species of Isotomurus are not fully sorted out. Having consulted Hopkins' key, and all his comments and caveats, I will say it is I. palustris, as I would have done in the 1960s and 1970s. The closest contender is I. plumosus.

    Harold
  • Options
    Paul IddonPaul Iddon Registered Users Posts: 5,129 Major grins
    edited February 28, 2015
    e6filmuser wrote: »
    Paul,

    I hesitated to go to species, knowing that the species of Isotomurus are not fully sorted out. Having consulted Hopkins' key, and all his comments and caveats, I will say it is I. palustris, as I would have done in the 1960s and 1970s. The closest contender is I. plumosus.

    Harold

    Thank you :)

    Paul.


    Link to my personal website: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk






Sign In or Register to comment.