Chicago Theater

AlexSharkAlexShark Registered Users Posts: 198 Major grins
edited March 23, 2015 in Other Cool Shots
thoughts?

1.
11069399_10153231431412425_7795714472250188629_n.jpg?oh=590cc6c081198dca5a2058c4a3374b59&oe=5573C132&__gda__=1438455895_ef3bb5cdadaee1790503b34eac9dc8a9

2.
10320255_10153232896222425_880328199372560612_n.jpg?oh=b03f6dfe6a973321b3a02ecb26e5d48f&oe=55AD6141&__gda__=1434070518_7df6181b7efaef1d88fbbb445a982084

3.
11082501_10153239559562425_4492120550563412013_n.jpg?oh=06b60dbae44b02d99ba9a7dc94b17a36&oe=55811CC2&__gda__=1438222548_a3df2afb24d943f44265c71819c5cb5f

Thank you for your feedback.
Photography is about what does not meet the eye
Be my guest: Alex Braverman Photography

Comments

  • lifeinfocuslifeinfocus Registered Users Posts: 1,461 Major grins
    edited March 21, 2015
    First thought - multiple exposure! Then the question are they indeed multiple exposure? If not, layered images?

    A lot to take in. Favorite is #2 because of the complexity and the number of images that interact together well. More of an abstract look then the other two.

    For me, #2 has more distinct images that blend well, while #1 and #3 images overlap a bit too much for me.

    I look forward to other photogs comments.

    Phil
    http://www.PhilsImaging.com
    "You don't take a photograph, you make it." ~Ansel Adams
    Phil
  • ThelensspotThelensspot Registered Users Posts: 2,041 Major grins
    edited March 21, 2015
    lifeinfocus wrote: »
    First thought - multiple exposure! Then the question are they indeed multiple exposure? If not, layered images?

    A lot to take in. Favorite is #2 because of the complexity and the number of images that interact together well. More of an abstract look then the other two.

    For me, #2 has more distinct images that blend well, while #1 and #3 images overlap a bit too much for me.

    I look forward to other photogs comments.

    Phil

    15524779-Ti.gif

    #2 by a long shot!
    "Photography is partly art and partly science. Really good photography adds discipline, sacrifice and a never ending pursuit of photographic excellence"...ziggy53

  • CCoopCCoop Registered Users Posts: 511 Major grins
    edited March 22, 2015
    Bright, busy, colorful, energetic. You've capture quite a lot of meaning here. Thank you!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,969 moderator
    edited March 22, 2015
    Chicago native here, if a bit removed in time and space. I remember it when it was Balaban and Katz, not Chase Bank :rutt. #1 doesn't grab me. #2 is probably the most interesting, what with the iconic [strike]Marshall Field's[/strike] Macy's clock and all. I'm sure you put a lot of time into this and might be reluctant to discard pixels, but for me a square crop anchored at the top left works better. I like #3 because the entire Chicago sign is intact. I realize it's there in #1 as well, but in a sort of where's Waldo sort of way.

    Just some thoughts, which is what you asked for. deal.gif
    My Pics
  • lifeinfocuslifeinfocus Registered Users Posts: 1,461 Major grins
    edited March 23, 2015
    Inquiring minds would like to know. In camera or post processing? That is are they multiple exposure or layered images?

    Phil
    http://www.PhilsImaging.com
    "You don't take a photograph, you make it." ~Ansel Adams
    Phil
Sign In or Register to comment.