Mitchell wrote: » Sweet shot with a lot of potential. I hope you shot in RAW.
Sam wrote: » Looks like a good candidate for post processing. Sam
puzzledpaul wrote: » Seems like it's a good choice for a bit (lot?) of OTT meddling pphttps://iso.500px.com/the-very-old-debate-of-image-manipulation/
Sam wrote: » I'll bite the bit....what be OTT? Sam
Comments
http://clearwaterphotography.smugmug.com/
Yes, I always shoot in RAW and JPEG.
Sam
Seems like it's a good choice for a bit (lot?) of OTT meddling
pp
https://iso.500px.com/the-very-old-debate-of-image-manipulation/
Flickr
I'll bite the bit....what be OTT?
Sam
Sam, maybe if you paid your net access service provider on a regular basis, they might let you use Google occasionally... ?
Over the top.
Standard parlance on this side of the pond
pp
Flickr
www.finesart.com
Chris .. Aka.."Tofer"- Toferphotography toferphotography.smugmug.com ~ Canon EOS 7D 18-135 3.5IS / GoPro Hero4 Silver / Rebel XT (350D) ~ Tamron 17-35mm SP AF 2.8 ~ Sigma 28-300 F3.5-6.3 DG Macro // Canon 75-300 zoom // Canon 430ex // - (Motorola Droid) - Lowepro Slingpack ==> Facebook