7D2 High School Football
jmphotocraft
Registered Users Posts: 2,987 Major grins
First time shooting this sport, so sorry if this is long. Fortunately my town recently rebuilt their football stadium and the lighting is decent. Game start time was 7pm. Really pleased with how my 7D2 and 70-200/2.8II performed. I feel like the pics got better as the night went on and I dialed in my settings. I was hired to be there, so I was right on the sideline. C&C welcome, thanks for looking.
1
2
3 - starting kick-off
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 - blood!
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 - touchdown run
24 - point to the tv camera!
25 - star of the team
26 - game (rout) over
1
2
3 - starting kick-off
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 - blood!
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 - touchdown run
24 - point to the tv camera!
25 - star of the team
26 - game (rout) over
-Jack
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
0
Comments
Any serious focus problems with that combination of Canon 7D Mark II and 70-20mm, f2.8L II (even intermittent problems)?
How does that camera feel shooting compared to the 5D Mark III? Do you like the AF point locations better on the 7D Mark II?
I see that many folks are recommending turning off all in-camera noise reduction for the 7D Mark II and sports. Any thoughts?
Did one of the York Wildcats get spiked in shot #13?
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Thanks Ziggy. I had anti-flicker off. Anti-flicker causes the fps rate to drop precipitously, of course because the camera has to time its shots with the flicker of the lights. I'd rather have 10fps and deal with flicker in post. Although I didn't seem to have to do that... These stadium lights must be pretty good.
No focus problems that I was aware of. AF does better with more contrast, so during dusk the AF seemed to miss a little more. After the sunlight was totally gone it got better.
On my 5D3 I make the line-type AF points un-selectable, which reduces the number of selectable points to 41. Of course this isn't the case on the 7D2, so you can select all 65, and they cover more of the frame. However I don't find either difference to be all that significant in practice when shooting sports. In the hand, the 7D2 feels a lot like the 5D3. I like the toggle lever around the joystick for quickly changing AF point selection modes. The shutter/mirror mechanism is more damped and seems more robust. The 5D3 sounds like a mousetrap compared to the 7D2.
I hadn't heard that about in-camera NR, so I believe I left it on the default setting. Seems fine to me, but I try not to pixel peep high ISO night sports images.
Not sure where the blood came from!
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Good shots and really like the colors. As the moderator noted, well saturated without seeming unnatural. What settings did you use on the 7D MK II for the above shots?
Thanks.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Here are some at higher ISO at a stadium with dimmer lights:
ISO 5000:
ISO 6400:
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
JBHotShots.com
Facebook
7DII w/Grip, 50D w/Grip, 24-70/2.8L, 70-200/2.8L, 85/1.8, 50/1.8, Rokinon 8mm FE 3.2, 580EXII 430EX
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.