FX + DX or FX + FX ????
[Deleted User]
Major grinsNorwayPosts: 0 Major grins
The user and all related content has been deleted.
0
Comments
Website
Having said all that, for some photographers based on the type of photography they do, a DX camera is a better fit and vice versa.
There are others here (Ziggy) who can give you a much better explanation of the difference and you might hear from them after my post. Hope this in some way helps!
The D7200 also has a very nice AF point distribution, compared with the D750, although the cross-type AF points are still very much centrally located.
Listening to what the others are telling you, if you have the finances a Nikon D810 might also be a great way to go, in that the D810 has a "DX format", meaning that it can crop in-camera down to the D7200 FOV. The resulting DX image still has a resolution of 15 MPixels, which is enough to crop further if needed. You can increase the frame rate to 7 FPS in DX Crop Mode with the optional MB-D12 battery pack. (There is also a 25 MPixel, 1.2x crop mode to round off your options.)
In actuality, I gather that many folks just shoot the D810 in full-frame and crop in post, in order to preserve all of their image options and to allow for framing inaccuracies during tracking; in other words people just frame the shot loosely with the intent to crop and re-frame later.
To summarize, I recommend looking at both the D7200 and the D810 models, and purchase whichever seems best suited to both your needs and your budget. I don't think you can go too far wrong with either combination:
... or ...
Your current D750 + a D7200
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Yes, I often do similar and it's nice not to change lenses in dusty environments too.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums