Anyone else shoot real estate?
jmphotocraft
Registered Users Posts: 2,987 Major grins
Since this seems to be the most active photography forum on this whole site and since this is where I "know" most people, I thought folks here might be interested in this. R/E is a pretty easy gig that can be a steady stream of income. I shot a house yesterday for an architect friend that I've been dying to get into for a while, he's been working on it for months and putting pics on facebook. Have a look if you want:
http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?p=2011513#post2011513
Thanks!
http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?p=2011513#post2011513
Thanks!
-Jack
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
0
Comments
Orv
Thomson, Ga. USA
www.Osalisburyphoto.smugmug.com
My Site
My Facebook
www.cameraone.biz
Thanks OrvSal. I have been shooting r/e occasionally for the better part of 8 years. I've seen that site and have never felt compelled to pay the membership fee. I'm always skeptical of such services, including the PSIA - professional ski instructors of America, but I digress! I'm pretty happy with the amount of business I get through friends and word of mouth, and actually I've gotten a few jobs because my site is one of the top google hits around here.
Agreed. Back when I first started I would simply expose for the interior and blow out the windows. This was not at all optimal but still better than the, um, "stuff" that generally most realtors take themselves. Then I moved to using two off-camera flashes in order to try to balance the light inside with the view out the windows. This worked well sometimes, other times not. When I got a 5D3, I discovered in-camera HDR and never used flash again. Now I'll take 3 bracketed raw shots and merge them to HDR in Lighroom because it usually does a better job. The HDR it creates is a dng raw so you can continue to work on it in a raw state. Although the in-cam was pretty good most of the time.
Thanks!
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.