Is it a good idea to sign your photos?
MelP
Registered Users Posts: 131 Major grins
I am thinking of adding a signature (or at least a logo) to some of my portraits and wedding photos. Is this a good idea or is it considered tacky? Of course I wouldn't put it in the way...
How many of you use signatures or logo on your photos?
Thanks for all suggestions,
Mel
How many of you use signatures or logo on your photos?
Thanks for all suggestions,
Mel
0
Comments
Since I have had proofs on CD printed into good prints and all (seems printer ignored the cpoyright on the CD label)...I am going to start copyrighting ALL my photos....get a color match to a nicce gold, blue and possibly grey so they aren't glaring and but still there and in a spot that id they try to crop it out...pic is shot....got to protect yourself...in the pre didigtal days it was gold foil imprinting and still is for some studios.
I do use professional paper that says it is a professional print though, so maybe in a round-about way I do do it after all
"Failure is feedback. And feedback is the breakfast of champions." - fortune cookie
Books included! I could get a mug shot and do finger prints, smile.
ginger (My daughters have gorgeous handwriting, they probably saw mine and got scared.)
Jack
http://www.SplendorousSojourns.com
Canon 1D Mk II N - Canon 5D - Canon EF 17-40 f/4L USM - Canon EF 24-105 f/4L IS USM - Canon EF 85 f/1.8 USM - Canon EF 100 f/2.8 macro - Canon EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS USM