Transfer of Images from CF/CFast to NAS painfully slow
Vocoder
Registered Users Posts: 7 Beginner grinner
Howdy,
I've got a Synology 1812+ NAS, with 6 disks, connected to a switch and finally to a Thunderbolt to ethernet adapter on a Macbook Pro. The gear is no slouch, all cables are CAT7 and all connections are gigabit.
That said, will only move about 1GB per minute from a USB3 card reader attached to a USB3 port on the Mac.
I've done everything I can think of to ensure settings between the Mac and the NAS are the same (no jumbo frames, auto-detect speed etc.) and still, it takes at least a half an hour for 27.4GB of raw files, or 1086 images, to copy from the card to the NAS. This is about 24 minutes longer than the online network speed calculators say it should take. Not to mention, the downtime in the post process workflow that a long delay like this induces.
I'm wondering if anyone here has been in the same position - and if there is anything I can try to get the speeds up?
Thank you in advance!
www.mikekruegerphotography.com
I've got a Synology 1812+ NAS, with 6 disks, connected to a switch and finally to a Thunderbolt to ethernet adapter on a Macbook Pro. The gear is no slouch, all cables are CAT7 and all connections are gigabit.
That said, will only move about 1GB per minute from a USB3 card reader attached to a USB3 port on the Mac.
I've done everything I can think of to ensure settings between the Mac and the NAS are the same (no jumbo frames, auto-detect speed etc.) and still, it takes at least a half an hour for 27.4GB of raw files, or 1086 images, to copy from the card to the NAS. This is about 24 minutes longer than the online network speed calculators say it should take. Not to mention, the downtime in the post process workflow that a long delay like this induces.
I'm wondering if anyone here has been in the same position - and if there is anything I can try to get the speeds up?
Thank you in advance!
www.mikekruegerphotography.com
0
Comments
I have been on trips where 10 or 20 Gb of image files would take half an hour or more through USB 2.0, so this is a nice breath of fresh air.
Do you think the Thunderbolt to ethernet adapter has any effect on downloading speed? USB 3.0 does not seem limiting in my limited experience with CFast cards.
My first thought would be to try to download from your CFast card to a single high speed external SSD and see how long that takes. If it is very fast, then that would make me think the Thunderbolt to ethernet connection might be playing a role.
I am using a pair of Sandisk 500 USB 3.0 SSDs ( 480 Gb ) for my storage in the field. I just don't wait for the CFast card to download now, it is lickety split. SO I don't think the CFast card or the card reader is at fault - what brand of card reader are you using?
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Where it gets unclear is how Apple has the internals connected: the Display and SSD are connected to a PCIe bus, and perhaps one USB port as well, so it is likely that the other lane may be used for the Thunderbolt port and USB ports. So, that may mean your ethernet and USB have to share the same channel. Therefore it is likely that ethernet could impact the speed. Given that thunderbolt supports 20GB symmetrical, one would think there is plenty of bandwidth, but since it bonds multiple links, with some overhead, there likely are collisions etc.
Anyway, you probably would get the fastest theoretical downloads by having just the USB card reader attached. If your CFast reader supports thunderbolt, I would use that instead, as its 4x faster than USB 3.0.
If it is a machine without a Gigabit port, make sure you have "Thunderbolt Software Update 1.2.1" installed on OS X Lion 10.7.4 (or above).
Also, disconnect everything else from the network switch (mentioned in the opening post) to make absolutely sure you are transferring at Gigabit speeds from the computer to the NAS.
All of the above are just things to try (thinking out loud), in addition to what was mentioned by others.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Sorry, I searched for "MacBook Pro ports" and found this page:
http://www.apple.com/macbook-pro/specs/
Is that not current?
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Yep, that one does indeed still have an ethernet port. But, while that model is still for sale, it is the old model...notice that it is also the only model with a spinning HD as well. I bet you had to dig to find it!
If you go to the apple page for Macbook Pro, they dont even feature the model any longer:
http://www.apple.com/macbook-pro/
Odd. Using the search string I mentioned above (without the quotes), Google returned that page I linked as the second result on the first page of results:
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Check the Thunderbolt/Ethernet connection, Advanced.. > Hardware.
Change Thunderbolt/Ethernet Configuration to "Manually".
If set at Duplex, "full-duplex, energy-efficient-ethernet", change it to "full-duplex".
Test transfer speed.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums