exif says 176mm but lens was at 200mm???
hmmmmmm
with the 70-200 4L on the 300D... my exif says I was only at 176mm and not 200mm
do I have a few extra mm in there somewhere???? or is just electronic screwiness? :dunno
with the 70-200 4L on the 300D... my exif says I was only at 176mm and not 200mm
do I have a few extra mm in there somewhere???? or is just electronic screwiness? :dunno
Dani
20D | 300D-IR | EF-S 10-22 | EF-S 18-55 | 50 f/1.8 II | 70-200 f/4L | 17-40L | Lensbaby 2.0 | 250D | 550ex | Gitzo 1257 | RRS BH-40 | RRS L-plates
The Blog | The Photos
20D | 300D-IR | EF-S 10-22 | EF-S 18-55 | 50 f/1.8 II | 70-200 f/4L | 17-40L | Lensbaby 2.0 | 250D | 550ex | Gitzo 1257 | RRS BH-40 | RRS L-plates
The Blog | The Photos
0
Comments
Where are you reading the exif from? Did you read from an edited file or from a file straight from the camera?
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
from the unedited raw file....
20D | 300D-IR | EF-S 10-22 | EF-S 18-55 | 50 f/1.8 II | 70-200 f/4L | 17-40L | Lensbaby 2.0 | 250D | 550ex | Gitzo 1257 | RRS BH-40 | RRS L-plates
The Blog | The Photos
This happens with some copies of these 70-200s. Next time you send your rebel in to Canon, send the lense with it. They may re-chip it.
James.
http://www.jamesjweg.com