Charlotte (My spouse, believe it or not!)

elfving73elfving73 Registered Users Posts: 941 Major grins
edited January 26, 2006 in People
Hello friends!

For some reason all of a sudden, I managed to get my spouse to pose for ATLEAST 2-3 minutes. *Haha* She really hates it and she has no patience what so ever. You know, if I ask her "now, just turn a liiiittle more to the left, forhead slightly down....." she goes "Please, just take that bl**dy picture!" Anyone familiar to this phenomen? ;o)
Comments and critics are most welcome!
Regards / Matty

Shooting:
I used my 10D, Canon 50 mm f/1.8 II, tripod, remote Switch Canon RS-80N3. I positioned her against the wall and placed a 3 bulb (25W) lamp without the lampshade on her left (right in picture).

Exif: Raw, 1/50s, f/2.2, ISO 400

Workflow:
Converted to B&W (Channel mixer) then made it a Split tone (adding color only to the shadows using the "Color Balance", checking the "shadows"-box, altering cyan-red +15, yellow-blue -15 (Ca). Then (on the two first versions) I boosted the color just a little via the "Hue/Saturation" increasing the "saturation". Did a little doging on her eyes, and some buring in the shadow areas around the frame. Added some USM (500/0,2/0) and a little extra sharpening on her eyes. On the last one, (version 2 of the second pic) I masked her eyes and added just a little "lens blur" to make the eyes pop a little more.

That's it!


53091408-O.jpg


53149121-O.jpg

I gave the second one another go, to the better?

53632484-O.jpg

Comments

  • binghottbinghott Registered Users Posts: 1,075 Major grins
    edited January 19, 2006
    i like it a lot, especially the eyes. i'm not saying what you did is wrong at all, but the only thing i see right now that i would've done differently is i would've had her hand pressed against her shoulder instead of being raised. i think that would make it look more comfortable.
  • elfving73elfving73 Registered Users Posts: 941 Major grins
    edited January 19, 2006
    Thanx Binghott! Well, I guess you're right, but you don't know Charlotte! :D You only got ½ a chance, and you better shoot fast! No waisting time on thinking! *Haha* I'm not kidding, 2-3 minutes was all I got!

    Matty
    binghott wrote:
    i like it a lot, especially the eyes. i'm not saying what you did is wrong at all, but the only thing i see right now that i would've done differently is i would've had her hand pressed against her shoulder instead of being raised. i think that would make it look more comfortable.
  • DirtyRatDirtyRat Registered Users Posts: 45 Big grins
    edited January 20, 2006
    Nicely Framed
    No patience can throw a shoot. I tell ya, if your subject isn't willing, it will show through in your pics! You did good job in the 2-3 min. you had.
    A side note, I have a pet tarantula named Charlotte!
  • JnicholsJnichols Registered Users Posts: 223 Major grins
    edited January 20, 2006
    She's beautiful. I really like the second pic- you wouldn't know she only gave you a few minutes to take her picture! As always, these are great - I look forward to seeing your posts.
  • wholenewlightwholenewlight Registered Users Posts: 1,529 Major grins
    edited January 20, 2006
    Matty,

    #2 is very nice - a big thumbs-up. Nothing wrong with #1 but I don't like the smile as much with the pose.

    As said before in this thread, great eyes.
    john w

    I knew, of course, that trees and plants had roots, stems, bark, branches and foliage that reached up toward the light. But I was coming to realize that the real magician was light itself.
    Edward Steichen


  • gubbsgubbs Registered Users Posts: 3,166 Major grins
    edited January 21, 2006
    in the first, her eyes are stunning but I find the highlights on her cheek and lips a little too harsh

    The second is just excellent.... clap.gif
  • PhotosbychuckPhotosbychuck Registered Users Posts: 1,239 Major grins
    edited January 21, 2006
    Hi Matty
    I think you got some great photos in such short notice.
    I know what you mean I can't get my wife to model for me either :-).
    I would like to see photos with a little more space around your wife.
    I don't like how the pinky finger was spread out so far in the first shot.
    Did you shoot in B&W or convert them in PS?

    Take Care,
    Chuck,
    D300S, 18-200mm VR, 70-300mm VR

    Aperture Focus Photography
    http://aperturefocus.com
  • SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
    edited January 22, 2006
    Matty

    nicely done-

    care to share your technique?-

    thanks
    george
  • elfving73elfving73 Registered Users Posts: 941 Major grins
    edited January 23, 2006
    Thanx DirtyRat! Haha! Did you name her after the spider in "Charlottes Web"? My oldest sons absolute favorite cartoon film. :):

    Matty
    DirtyRat wrote:
    No patience can throw a shoot. I tell ya, if your subject isn't willing, it will show through in your pics! You did good job in the 2-3 min. you had.
    A side note, I have a pet tarantula named Charlotte!
  • NappaloniaNappalonia Registered Users Posts: 96 Big grins
    edited January 23, 2006
    I love the sharpness in the eyesthumb.gif
    http://nappalonia.smugmug.com/gallery/580776

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    20D :clap
    Canon
    18-55
    85 1.8 :wink
    Tamron
    28-75 2.8
    Sigma
    70-300 DG APO Macro
    30 1.4:thumb
  • elfving73elfving73 Registered Users Posts: 941 Major grins
    edited January 24, 2006
    Thank you, Jen! :): I think I'll try with her again every now and then, and eventually, perhaps she will enjoy it! :): (But I wouldn't bet on it!)

    Matty
    Jnichols wrote:
    She's beautiful. I really like the second pic- you wouldn't know she only gave you a few minutes to take her picture! As always, these are great - I look forward to seeing your posts.
  • elfving73elfving73 Registered Users Posts: 941 Major grins
    edited January 24, 2006
    Thanx John! I gave #2 another go, do ya like it better?

    Matty
    Matty,

    #2 is very nice - a big thumbs-up. Nothing wrong with #1 but I don't like the smile as much with the pose.

    As said before in this thread, great eyes.
  • elfving73elfving73 Registered Users Posts: 941 Major grins
    edited January 24, 2006
    Thanx gubbs! My intention was rather hard lighting with heavy shadows, but you are right, the highlights on the cheek is a little to harsh.

    Matty

    gubbs wrote:
    in the first, her eyes are stunning but I find the highlights on her cheek and lips a little too harsh

    The second is just excellent.... clap.gif
  • elfving73elfving73 Registered Users Posts: 941 Major grins
    edited January 24, 2006
    Thanx Chuck!
    If I'll ever get the chanse again, I'll take some photos with more space around - but I have a hard time believing that is gonna happen! ne_nau.gif ´

    I shot in color, converted in PSCS2 afterwards!

    Matty

    Hi Matty
    I think you got some great photos in such short notice.
    I know what you mean I can't get my wife to model for me either :-).
    I would like to see photos with a little more space around your wife.
    I don't like how the pinky finger was spread out so far in the first shot.
    Did you shoot in B&W or convert them in PS?

    Take Care,
    Chuck,
  • elfving73elfving73 Registered Users Posts: 941 Major grins
    edited January 24, 2006
    Thank you, George!

    Shooting:
    I used my 10D, Canon 50 mm f/1.8 II, tripod, remote Switch Canon RS-80N3. I positioned her against the wall and placed a 3 bulb (25W) lamp without the lampshade on her left (right in picture).

    Exif: Raw, 1/50s, f/2.2, ISO 400

    Workflow:
    Converted to B&W (Channel mixer) then made it a Split tone (adding color only to the shadows using the "Color Balance", checking the "shadows"-box, altering cyan-red +15, yellow-blue -15 (Ca). Then (on the two first versions) I boosted the color just a little via the "Hue/Saturation" increasing the "saturation". Did a little doging on her eyes, and some buring in the shadow areas around the frame. Added some USM (500/0,2/0) and a little extra sharpening on her eyes. On the last one, (version 2 of the second pic) I masked her eyes and added just a little "lens blur" to make the eyes pop a little more.

    That's it!

    Regards / Matty



    gefillmore wrote:
    Matty

    nicely done-

    care to share your technique?-

    thanks
    george
  • elfving73elfving73 Registered Users Posts: 941 Major grins
    edited January 24, 2006
    Thank you, Nappalonia! thumb.gif

    Matty
    Nappalonia wrote:
    I love the sharpness in the eyesthumb.gif
  • wholenewlightwholenewlight Registered Users Posts: 1,529 Major grins
    edited January 24, 2006
    elfving73 wrote:
    Thanx John! I gave #2 another go, do ya like it better?

    Matty

    I actually like the tonal quality of the first version of #2 better. Your newer version looks a little too "hot" or washed out in the brighter areas of the shot.

    But it might be my flat panel monitor. Not the best Dell. Need to upgrade.
    john w

    I knew, of course, that trees and plants had roots, stems, bark, branches and foliage that reached up toward the light. But I was coming to realize that the real magician was light itself.
    Edward Steichen


  • SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
    edited January 25, 2006
    elfving73 wrote:
    Thank you, George!

    Shooting:
    I used my 10D, Canon 50 mm f/1.8 II, tripod, remote Switch Canon RS-80N3. I positioned her against the wall and placed a 3 bulb (25W) lamp without the lampshade on her left (right in picture).

    Exif: Raw, 1/50s, f/2.2, ISO 400

    Workflow:
    Converted to B&W (Channel mixer) then made it a Split tone (adding color only to the shadows using the "Color Balance", checking the "shadows"-box, altering cyan-red +15, yellow-blue -15 (Ca). Then (on the two first versions) I boosted the color just a little via the "Hue/Saturation" increasing the "saturation". Did a little doging on her eyes, and some buring in the shadow areas around the frame. Added some USM (500/0,2/0) and a little extra sharpening on her eyes. On the last one, (version 2 of the second pic) I masked her eyes and added just a little "lens blur" to make the eyes pop a little more.

    That's it!

    Regards / Matty

    Matty

    thank you very much for that detail--

    liked your toothpaste pic--pretty cool-

    I'm an ultrasound tech and run scans (not scams) on hospital patients--a lot of them need someone like you for help-

    good job all round, Matty!
    george
  • Yuri PautovYuri Pautov Registered Users Posts: 1,918 Major grins
    edited January 26, 2006
    Mattias!
    I like all of them, but the last one is just super - very very touching...
    Spasibo,
    Yuri
Sign In or Register to comment.