Landscape +1

JuanoJuano Registered Users Posts: 4,890 Major grins
edited January 17, 2020 in Other Cool Shots

I shot this back in 2016... there are image quality issues, but it is a pic I keep coming back to. I finally decided to post it.

Comments

  • denisegoldbergdenisegoldberg Administrators Posts: 14,383 moderator
    edited January 16, 2020

    I like it, very moody.
    I'd like to be there!

  • David_S85David_S85 Administrators Posts: 13,249 moderator
    edited January 13, 2020

    Looks good to me, too.

    That area is foggy and misty, if that's the quality issues you are referring to. Except for some extra blue in there (which is easily tamed), it looks fine to me.

    Mine was a little less foggy and misty, but that's what it is.
    https://www.davidwattsphotography.com/Vacation/Oregon/i-36GfdNg/A

    My Smugmug
    "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
  • JuanoJuano Registered Users Posts: 4,890 Major grins

    Thanks David, thanks for sharing your image too. Cannon Beach has very interesting features.

  • David_S85David_S85 Administrators Posts: 13,249 moderator
    edited January 15, 2020

    I was trying to remember the name for the foggy weather on a coast that is often different than it is just inland. It is "Marine Layer." Your photo aptly demonstrates this.

    My Smugmug
    "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
  • JuanoJuano Registered Users Posts: 4,890 Major grins

    @David_S85 said:
    I was trying to remember the name for the foggy weather on a coast that is often different than it is just inland. It is "Marine Layer." Your photo aptly demonstrates this.

    I hadn't heard the term, thanks.

  • toragstorags Registered Users Posts: 4,615 Major grins

    Forget the technicales the shot is a great image...

    The contrasts & subtle colors really work for me...

    In San Francisco we get that weather condition all the time...

    Rags
  • JuanoJuano Registered Users Posts: 4,890 Major grins

    Thanks Rags!

  • StumblebumStumblebum Registered Users Posts: 8,480 Major grins

    Its great Cristobal! I want tad more bottom though.....more water.....cheers!

  • kurzvorzwoelfkurzvorzwoelf Registered Users Posts: 339 Major grins

    I also like it, it has a sense of mistery to it and enough drama to make it interesting.

    Wise words from the Dog of Wisdom: If your ball is too big for your mouth, it's not yours.

    I'm here to learn and progress. Honest feedback and criticism on my images is warmly appreciated!

    My SmugMug site - kurzvorzwoelf.com

  • JuanoJuano Registered Users Posts: 4,890 Major grins

    @Stumblebum said:
    Its great Cristobal! I want tad more bottom though.....more water.....cheers!

    Thanks Taz, you might be right. I will work on a new version and see how it feels.

    @kurzvorzwoelf said:
    I also like it, it has a sense of mistery to it and enough drama to make it interesting.

    Thanks!

  • JuanoJuano Registered Users Posts: 4,890 Major grins

    Hey Taz, what do you think?

  • black mambablack mamba Registered Users Posts: 8,323 Major grins

    The adjusted version is spot on. Taz was right..The extra detail at the bottm really helps. It was, though, a nice shot as it was.

    I always wanted to lie naked on a bearskin rug in front of a fireplace. Cracker Barrel didn't take kindly to it.
  • JuanoJuano Registered Users Posts: 4,890 Major grins

    @black mamba said:
    The adjusted version is spot on. Taz was right..The extra detail at the bottm really helps. It was, though, a nice shot as it was.

    Thanks Tom, Taz is often right...

  • toragstorags Registered Users Posts: 4,615 Major grins

    A different view....

    The bottom reduces some of the high key contrast the original had...

    I liked the high key treatment because real fog is usually darker grey and less dynamic

    Rags
  • JuanoJuano Registered Users Posts: 4,890 Major grins

    @torags said:
    A different view....

    The bottom reduces some of the high key contrast the original had...

    I liked the high key treatment because real fog is usually darker grey and less dynamic

    Good point too. I can go either way.

  • StumblebumStumblebum Registered Users Posts: 8,480 Major grins

    Details in bottom are wonderful.....I was thinking bit more area in bottom....if available....the horizontal line of earth is too close to bottom edge.....the moodiness and simplicity makes it a wall hanger overalll..Cheers Cristobal!

  • JuanoJuano Registered Users Posts: 4,890 Major grins

    Thanks for the comment Taz. I’m still undecided, in the mean time I printed three Oregon themed pics and I like the results!

  • StumblebumStumblebum Registered Users Posts: 8,480 Major grins

    Sweet! Is that Mt. Hood? I have been on it!!

  • redleashredleash Registered Users Posts: 3,840 Major grins

    I like both versions, probably prefer the second one but not by much. I am drawn to the moodiness. I also am jealous--have never been to Oregon!

    Great work, as always!

    Lauren

    "But ask the animals, and they will teach you." (Job 12:7)

    Lauren Blackwell
    www.redleashphoto.com
  • JuanoJuano Registered Users Posts: 4,890 Major grins

    @redleash said:
    I like both versions, probably prefer the second one but not by much. I am drawn to the moodiness. I also am jealous--have never been to Oregon!

    Great work, as always!

    Lauren

    Many thanks! I think Rags has a point saying that more than how much water there is, the high key treatment is more important. I have to go back and try different things.

Sign In or Register to comment.