I need lens help!

nillaismydognillaismydog Registered Users Posts: 32 Big grins
edited January 26, 2006 in Accessories
I'm ready to get a new lens (under $500 prefereably). Ideally I would want an 18-200mm F2.8 lens which I'm pretty sure doesn't exist, and if it did I'm sure it would be pretty expensive. I really need a range of at least 28-135mm and need it to work in low light settings. I have a rebel xt, but am thinking about getting the 5D so whatever I get I want it to be good enough for either of them. I'm leaning more towards sigma lenses since they're much cheaper and I don't care much about how "sturdy" it feels. I just want it to do what I need it to without losing much (or any) quality.

One question is do I need to look at lens construction (group/elements) or the number of blades? I don't know what is good for either of those. also does the filter size matter? I don't really care unless there's a good reason for a bigger or smaller one. So here's a few of the lenses I'm looking at. with the above stats,etc

lens - zoom - f# - price - (group/element) - blades - filter

canon 28-200mm f3.5-5.6 - $359-549 - (12/16) - 5 - 72mm
sigma 28-200mm f3.5-5.6 - $199 - (14/16) - 8 - 62mm
sigma 24-135mm f2.8-4.5 - $319-359 - (15/16) - 9 - 77mm
sigma 18-200mm f3.5-6.3 - $369-459 - (13/15) - 7 - 62mm

I like the 18-200 range but was conserned about the f range. I thought the 24-135 may be the best option because of the f range. I really don't know what is best so if you guys could give me your opinions that'd be wonderful! Thanks

Comments

  • DanielBDanielB Registered Users Posts: 2,362 Major grins
    edited January 25, 2006
    One question is do I need to look at lens construction (group/elements) or the number of blades? I don't know what is good for either of those. also does the filter size matter? I don't really care unless there's a good reason for a bigger or smaller one. So here's a few of the lenses I'm looking at. with the above stats,etc


    for your first question, More blades=better bokeh at low apeturesthumb.gif ,


    2nd question-filter size, the bigger the size= the more money you spend on them

    so yeah,

    the

    sigma 24-135mm f2.8-4.5 - $319-359 - (15/16) - 9 - 77mm

    77mm is a common filter sizethumb.gif
    good range,
    2.8 on the low end of you're apeture range,
    affordable

    deal.gif

    hope i helped,
    Daniel
    Daniel Bauer
    smugmug: www.StandOutphoto.smugmug.com

  • nillaismydognillaismydog Registered Users Posts: 32 Big grins
    edited January 25, 2006
    DanielB wrote:
    for your first question, More blades=better bokeh at low apeturesthumb.gif ,


    2nd question-filter size, the bigger the size= the more money you spend on them

    so yeah,

    the

    sigma 24-135mm f2.8-4.5 - $319-359 - (15/16) - 9 - 77mm

    77mm is a common filter sizethumb.gif
    good range,
    2.8 on the low end of you're apeture range,
    affordable

    deal.gif

    hope i helped,
    Daniel

    thanks for the info. It helped allot. The 24-135mm f/2.8-4.5 was the one I was leaning towards, but wasn't sure exactly why the numbers were better =) thanks again
  • morrisphotography2003morrisphotography2003 Registered Users Posts: 208 Major grins
    edited January 25, 2006
    need it to work in low light settings. I have a rebel xt, but am thinking about getting the 5D


    remember that with the 5D you get better noise reduction, so that is one thing that you can keep in mind when choosing your next lens.
    Bob.
  • nillaismydognillaismydog Registered Users Posts: 32 Big grins
    edited January 26, 2006
    need it to work in low light settings. I have a rebel xt, but am thinking about getting the 5D


    remember that with the 5D you get better noise reduction, so that is one thing that you can keep in mind when choosing your next lens.
    Bob.

    I didn't even think about that so thank you
  • gluwatergluwater Registered Users Posts: 3,599 Major grins
    edited January 26, 2006
    If you are going to get a 5D why are you getting a lens you may not be happy with? I would get good lenses before you upgrade cameras. You said you need them to work in low light situatuations but all the lenses you listed with the exception of the Sigma 24-135 f/2.8-4.5 will work poorly in low light. Even the 24-135 will be at f/4.5 at 135mm and that will not work in low light even at high ISO.

    What I would suggest for under $500 is two lenses. They don't fit your 18-200mm requirement but are good lenses and will get you better shots in low light than any zoom.

    Canon 50mm f/1.8 - $80
    Canon 85mm f/1.8 - $350

    Or if none of these choices is really what you are looking for than save your money to buy what you really want. I can guarentee you that if you buy a lens you think you may not like you probably will not like it and end up spending more money when you sell it and get another lens.
    Nick
    SmugMug Technical Account Manager
    Travel = good. Woo, shooting!
    nickwphoto
Sign In or Register to comment.